From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
To: <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:35:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7a48bbf-d783-4636-8f75-35c9904ffe05@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5670b4c0-9345-4b11-be7d-1c6426d8db86@microchip.com>
Hi Jakub,
On 12/12/24 6:03 pm, Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On 10/12/24 5:41 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:05:18 +0530 Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>>> @@ -1210,7 +1213,9 @@ netdev_tx_t oa_tc6_start_xmit(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + mutex_lock(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
>>> tc6->waiting_tx_skb = skb;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
>>
>> start_xmit runs in BH / softirq context. You can't take sleeping locks.
>> The lock has to be a spin lock. You could possibly try to use the
>> existing spin lock of the tx queue (__netif_tx_lock()) but that may be
>> more challenging to do cleanly from within a library..
> Thanks for the input. Yes, it looks like implementing a spin lock would
> be a right choice. I will implement it and do the testing as you
> suggested below and share the feedback.
I tried using spin_lock_bh() variants (as the softirq involved) on both
start_xmit() and spi_thread() where the critical regions need to be
protected and tested by enabling the Kconfigs in the
kernel/configs/debug.config. Didn't notice any warnings in the dmesg log.
Note: Prior to the above test, purposefully I tried with spin_lock()
variants on both the sides to check/simulate for the warnings using
Kconfigs kernel/configs/debug.config. Got some warnings in the dmesg
regarding deadlock which clarified the expected behavior. And then I
proceeded with the above fix and it worked as expected.
If you agree, I will prepare the next version with this fix and post.
Best regards,
Parthiban V
>
> Best regards,
> Parthiban V
>>
>> Please make sure you test with builds including the
>> kernel/configs/debug.config Kconfigs.
>> --
>> pw-bot: cr
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 13:35 [PATCH net v3 0/2] Fixes on the OPEN Alliance TC6 10BASE-T1x MAC-PHY support generic lib Parthiban Veerasooran
2024-12-04 13:35 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix infinite loop error when tx credits becomes 0 Parthiban Veerasooran
2024-12-04 13:35 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers Parthiban Veerasooran
2024-12-10 0:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-12 12:33 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2024-12-13 10:35 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran [this message]
2024-12-14 2:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-16 4:16 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7a48bbf-d783-4636-8f75-35c9904ffe05@microchip.com \
--to=parthiban.veerasooran@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox