public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Stephen Langstaff <stephenlangstaff1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, OlteanV@gmail.com
Subject: Re: drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop_bdinfo.c build problems
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 21:05:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7d6fdcb-4b01-4bc1-8e4b-3cf4ccb951e3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <949fcbea-23dc-44c1-9146-c358b15b9253@lunn.ch>



On 5/14/2024 9:17 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Stephen Langstaff wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:32 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> So try to making FIXED_PHY = m, and load it after dsa_loop_bdinfo.ko.
>>
>> In my configuration FIXED_PHY is selected by several other modules:
>>    │ Selected by [y]:
>>    │   - FSL_DPAA_ETH [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] &&
>> NET_VENDOR_FREESCALE [=y] && FSL_DPAA [=y] && FSL_FMAN [=y]
>>    │   - FWNODE_MDIO [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && MDIO_DEVICE [=y] &&
>> (ACPI [=y] || OF [=y] || COMPILE_TEST [=n])
>>    │   - OF_MDIO [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && MDIO_DEVICE [=y] && OF [=y]
>> && PHYLIB [=y]
>>
>> ...so it looks pretty tied up with the MDIO support which I guess I
>> will need for the real PHY!
>>
>> If I sorted out building the dsa_loop_bdinfo.c code as a built-in do
>> you think that would solve the ordering issue?

I have re-created the issue with CONFIG_FIXED_PHY=y and for a reason I 
do not yet understand the following rule:

obj-$(CONFIG_FIXED_PHY)                += dsa_loop_bdinfo.o

does not result in the kernel image containing the dsa_loop_bdinfo.o 
object symbols. I am fairly sure this worked when this was submitted 
back then, so give me a day or two to figure out why. AFAICT the make 
rule is simply not executed.

> 
> Probably.
> 
> Florian test setup shows it can work.
> 
> This mdio board info stuff is based on the same concept for I2C
> devices. However, it is simplified a bit, since it is not really meant
> for production use. What i suspect the I2C version does is that when a
> new board info is registers, it walks all the existing I2C busses and
> sees if there is a match. The MDIO version is missing this, it only
> runs the match when a bus is added. So it is less forgiving of order.

Yes that is fair enough, there could be improvements in that area. Or 
nowadays, given that software node(s) are a thing and that we can apply 
overlays to PCI(e) devices, we might consider doing that and ditch 
dsa_loop_bdinfo.c entirely.
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-13 15:33 drivers/net/dsa/dsa_loop_bdinfo.c build problems Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-13 15:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-13 15:36   ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-13 15:40     ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-13 15:45       ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-13 15:50         ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-13 16:21           ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-13 16:54             ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-13 17:40               ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-13 17:54                 ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                   ` <CAHx5RXCF0=Soz_k88RGvJFGrajaxn=mVnqpb99GAQ=b7XOcWiw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-05-13 19:05                     ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-14  9:28                       ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-14 12:32                         ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-14 16:08                           ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-14 16:17                             ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-15  4:05                               ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2024-05-15 19:20                                 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-16  2:17                                   ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-16  3:35                                     ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-16  6:39                                       ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-05-15  9:23                               ` Stephen Langstaff
2024-05-15 19:26                                 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-16  9:27                                   ` Stephen Langstaff
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-13 14:43 Stephen Langstaff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7d6fdcb-4b01-4bc1-8e4b-3cf4ccb951e3@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=OlteanV@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephenlangstaff1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox