From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9467C7619A for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230170AbjDLODO (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:03:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229555AbjDLODM (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:03:12 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C07FF2 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1681308190; x=1712844190; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n/9nWg9ADNDZxhAMoIa6mw8OZXc7bxhlG+mD8jYD9jY=; b=TQI6/omJ7JdfsbOIcslMNJDCUiypnMlaOjvu547LLSunpVmsdMONHaWq 4nPkw781up7hZyck9JhWJDA/17DFN0mUQouDHCT6rMoWya4QiFAoZ95PR GPJazL/XSzpiYsBgB/feH+Ch9ukPvQKXTibmMc5nY2SpPSkN8O9IfHjyr PVs9BlWzp/UDrcv8ePQ9BTJdfJoekmMW7r/xBLsix27Mo1TfyVt+MkRGg FvCYkEyNMcj3rkQOml6ZHvfdBkL1a0HviNDyeTCtzEMs360oR+vpAD6/I Q4HYB7NGGRdtzeVnah0N//FdR4MB7YiPuwdWkxDwNUDa7wHNr5HR18kbP Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10678"; a="342660767" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,339,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="342660767" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Apr 2023 07:02:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10678"; a="691540396" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,339,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="691540396" Received: from blu2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.215.58]) ([10.254.215.58]) by fmsmga007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Apr 2023 07:02:45 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:02:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Vinod Koul , Tina Zhang , Jacob Pan , Christophe JAILLET , "iommu@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] iommu/vt-d: Fix operand size in bitwise operation Content-Language: en-US To: David Laight , Joerg Roedel References: <20230411064815.31456-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20230411064815.31456-12-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <6d9ed10d-12ee-792f-fc34-60a8e432c5d2@linux.intel.com> From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/4/12 21:27, David Laight wrote: > From: Baolu Lu >> Sent: 12 April 2023 14:11 > ... >> The addresses the following issue reported by klocwork tool: >> >> - operands of different size in bitwise operations > Then fix the stupid tool to not be that pedantic. Good idea. But before the users/customers stop complaining, let's have a cleanup like this. :-) Best regards, baolu