From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta0.migadu.com (out-170.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703D033A9C1 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2026 11:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783338447; cv=none; b=oBKGWQP5EYhlw0eV9tfWx83/xtvinkr1JMOndcSMFIKGrMa4udE2lBz2oG7hi33DZWFnCMRyW65ZR3tWEG3OYVnbbtzO95VIdZnD0FtH+gyD210VY6m1giPpLiFWaCZj07J/VRbJJShyG8420dHabSi0DWKkfoUZRL87aCMacQE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783338447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UXTIo9/padBfKT08CETd2El8sJe6ny6hQkAfQAnVr28=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=p2Bad2FRz8j0ftYmpQKkGC4Jlz9jaREXmHBx5nNPvVUm2e84yfSEFlNvakkJDeWBSIV3eewOFSpXLNZOx5D4T75OwzkTAzkGtFK6NDXNglhu7po5/+4XbExdTdleNJcpQRlGow8JfVYJDhpZCXjeFef5Qy7ie319HyVGbZiI8lI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=gQJt0jjt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="gQJt0jjt" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1783338434; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/uVOp50wQNseU2ateMqyJO/VWBf4s7zsEypfE7I4Lxw=; b=gQJt0jjt4P5bc3AeX/Nc7aT/27Bu5QV0jzteZ9xZQV02Po2jNZtWFPV76Vg3qYthIi6HVV BAYhcggNP8JT79EUAmi4m1Jclqa0HavW2fds1vCS+54vONOfTl+1cbR7EtL/odNiTgSW9b haxcbBaNNRt78x8tIprLFRf1a0+G5rs= Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 12:47:03 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] dpll: add DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_NCO pin type To: Paolo Abeni , Ivan Vecera , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Donald Hunter , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Pirko , Michal Schmidt , Pasi Vaananen , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Petr Oros , Prathosh Satish , Simon Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260630125536.720717-1-ivecera@redhat.com> <20260630125536.720717-3-ivecera@redhat.com> <455c46ac-25cb-45d4-9cb3-5330f7b553c0@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: <455c46ac-25cb-45d4-9cb3-5330f7b553c0@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 06/07/2026 10:31, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 6/30/26 2:55 PM, Ivan Vecera wrote: >> Add DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_NCO pin type for virtual pins representing >> the NCO mode of a DPLL. When connected as a DPLL input, the DPLL >> enters NCO mode where the output frequency is adjusted by the host >> via the PTP clock interface. >> >> Update the fractional-frequency-offset and fractional-frequency- >> offset-ppt attribute documentation to note that for INT_NCO pins >> these attributes represent the DPLL's current output frequency >> offset from its nominal frequency. >> >> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera > > @Vadim: it's not clear to me if your doubts over the design choice > raised in previous iterations are still there. My understanding is there > is reasonable agreement vs the new pin type, if you have very strong > objections please raise them soonish. @Paolo: I still have my doubts here, but the patchset has Rb tags from Jiri, who is DPLL maintainer as well, so I think it's good to go...