From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9313BADB2; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782896036; cv=none; b=ScIF920IPYr3kfqVmsCfCvlBVscglXce0ncoTUvr7qAu8jxJDLu+iHv/XddkQdCECJ3WswNZTQNxN6To4rBt40zoE8SVSWkyPQJCGPMx4FARZ904BNwWhaDsAMCufAAQwHl9jIs1BKvqQ/nvIg9m4Gc/jO6YcOkO/AH0APC8jYA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782896036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=acfA2nK7bh4whLOuiz/5GbblwchT0G0kI11Z6H6Rdqc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Dxg1Hiw4FR4E33MXHw0gER9aXiaNnbrzwkOc6645LJ/sKFz8IRNHesvYjCpGUE+hubafUqrGwQ91/GBjIO3goxMQuvSxjRZwqXYNFsMUbhsFtyljWcmuJFPdJchhBW7r4mqI1UM5YmpA049yYhDiVxzv44uJCMIH9sOQk/5V12A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aUPFMWiA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aUPFMWiA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE4E71F000E9; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:53:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782896034; bh=f9jOYegPwslwL2Ey/z44d8SyEF7LBm16Uq80eeOBC3Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=aUPFMWiAmeCqlwyghILR5V2Xi2R/0J6HC8UOrWNzINOiSUIqtn5RptDAFLTzjoVwR 0Voww1Mn74eCZP0+TtFXCCbyCu88Svz85MRQToW52TKkFBnGn8u2ApXnPRtHT2dj7g agcXG33i38gnZg0tmFez/V5vs+PQNBTwzpiq13p9G2QjM/ttNK7p9fK9CUbcQPLKLe 5acavaPdSmCXHifnDCkUK3QzR5DAHuvFIbNcLu+qwydgNVh8rRzNxUJFDFprjpieqg SvUhHiZRP7l1f4g9AO5zp8m8WJ9x7o0ZaqT9awmPmwBUjm34/qREYOPAJ+JcxITULH XLFamcXSOO0WA== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:53:49 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote , Madhavan Srinivasan , Paul Moore Cc: Harsh Prateek Bora , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Eric Paris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, audit@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Weissschuh , =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= , ritesh.list@gmail.com References: <261b1be5b8dc526b83d73e8281e682a73536ea28.1773155031.git.chleroy@kernel.org> <09e72f42-e180-4e2b-b379-92b755792a2c@linux.ibm.com> <9c53ae3f-ccfd-4e8f-ac4f-0038e9b97a7e@linux.ibm.com> <50507bb3-4229-4815-90e8-c01eaad058fc@linux.ibm.com> Content-Language: fr-FR From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" In-Reply-To: <50507bb3-4229-4815-90e8-c01eaad058fc@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 01/07/2026 à 10:09, Venkat Rao Bagalkote a écrit : > > On 01/07/26 10:26 am, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >> >> >> Le 01/07/2026 à 06:32, Venkat Rao Bagalkote a écrit : >>> >>> On 01/07/26 7:44 am, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: >>>> >>>> On 7/1/26 12:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 1:42 AM Madhavan Srinivasan >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/13/26 10:05 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/03/26 12:49 am, Paul Moore wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:08 AM Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> From: Christophe Leroy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Commit e65e1fc2d24b ("[PATCH] syscall class hookup for all normal >>>>>>>>> targets") added generic support for AUDIT but that didn't include >>>>>>>>> support for bi-arch like powerpc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Commit 4b58841149dc ("audit: Add generic compat syscall support") >>>>>>>>> added generic support for bi-arch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Convert powerpc to that bi-arch generic audit support. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With this change generated text is similar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thomas has confirmed that the previously failing >>>>>>>>> filter_exclude/test >>>>>>>>> is now successful both without and with this patch, see [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? >>>>>>>>> url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F20260306115350- >>>>>>>>> ef265661-6d6b-4043-9bd0-8e6b437d0d67%40linutronix.de%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C81e1e4e3bae245103d3308ded729bb47%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639184771399964577%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FtCHXFR5np67gntCnXqv7Eemo5WuwaIEcywxZQzDADA%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Link: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? >>>>>>>>> url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flinuxppc%2Fissues%2Fissues%2F412&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C81e1e4e3bae245103d3308ded729bb47%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639184771400190794%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4fPEX7HuGBcxOcXlcJVQvDdP7Y9InhDpbz3z%2BS9lkCQ%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy >>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> Venkat, a test result with >>>>>>>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? >>>>>>>>> url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flinux-audit%2Faudit- >>>>>>>>> testsuite&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C81e1e4e3bae245103d3308ded729bb47%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639184771400214912%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yHp3p5zNx%2BqQg2cKBsKJADWcUcKVtZstzNScBfWzF%2FQ%3D&reserved=0 would be appreciated. >>>>>>>> Yes, I'd like to see confirmation that the audit test suite runs >>>>>>>> clean >>>>>>>> on ppc systems with this patch applied, and unfortunately without a >>>>>>>> ppc system I have no way to test this myself. >>>>>> My bad, this is a miss from my end. >>>>>> Venkat is already on this and will update the results here. >>>>> Do we have an update on this?  Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall >>>>> seeing any test results. >>>> Venkat, did run the test but I guess he missed to respond here, >>>> Details of his test run that he shared me in the internal chat from >>>> May 13. >>> >>> >>> Sorry, My bad. I missed updating here. Yes, this was tested in May. >>> Please let me know, if a re-run is required? >> >> It looks like netcat (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? >> url=https%3A%2F%2Flinux.die.net%2Fman%2F1%2Fnc&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C97ac234e82884f729d1508ded7480f62%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639184901648983046%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=18PJTLp9ozMqSkWWvBZmtjzjTI355Oq%2F5aqmU6zCiZE%3D&reserved=0) is not installed in you setup. Are you able to install it and rerun the test ? > > > I investigated the failure on the RHEL 10 ppc64le test system. > > > The netfilter_pkt failure is due to missing userspace dependencies: > > Can't exec "nc": No such file or directory > Can't exec "iptables": No such file or directory > Can't exec "ip6tables": No such file or directory > > I checked the system and confirmed that nc, ncat, iptables, and > ip6tables are not installed: > > > which nc > which ncat > which iptables > which ip6tables > > > all return "not found". > > The system has nftables installed (/usr/sbin/nft), but I was unable to > locate packages providing nc/ncat or iptables/ip6tables in the currently > enabled repositories (epel, rh10_base, rh10_app, rh10_crb). Found: - https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/10/Everything/ppc64le/Packages/n/netcat-1.238-1.el10_3.ppc64le.rpm - https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/almalinux-kitten/10/baseos/ppc64le/iptables-nft-1.8.11-6.el10.ppc64le.html - https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos-stream/10/appstream/ppc64le/iptables-devel-1.8.11-14.el10.ppc64le.html Does it help ? Christophe > > > At this point, the remaining failure appears to be an environmental > dependency issue rather than a test failure. Please let me know if there > is a recommended package/repository for EL10 ppc64le that provides > netcat and iptables compatibility tools, and I can re-run the test. > > > Regards, > > Venkat. > >> >> Thanks >> Christophe >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Venkat. >>> >>>> >>>> backlog_wait_time_actual_reset/test .. ok >>>> bpf/test ............................. ok >>>> exec_execve/test ..................... ok >>>> exec_name/test ....................... ok >>>> fanotify/test ........................ ok >>>> field_compare/test ................... ok >>>> file_create/test ..................... ok >>>> file_delete/test ..................... ok >>>> file_permission/test ................. ok >>>> file_rename/test ..................... ok >>>> filter_exclude/test .................. ok >>>> filter_exit/test ..................... ok >>>> filter_saddr_fam/test ................ ok >>>> filter_sessionid/test ................ ok >>>> io_uring/test ........................ ok >>>> login_tty/test ....................... ok >>>> lost_reset/test ...................... ok >>>> netfilter_pkt/test ................... Can't exec "nc": No such file >>>> or directory at netfilter_pkt/test line 83. >>>> >>>> Venkat, can you please re-run if possible and paste the log here. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Maddy >>>> >>>> >>