Re: [PATCH 5/6] iommu: init pasid array while doing domain_replace and iopf is active

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

On 9/5/24 11:30 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 9/4/24 9:17 PM, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Joel Granados<j.granados@samsung.com>
>>
>> iommu_report_device_fault expects a pasid array to have an
>> iommu_attach_handle when a fault is detected.
> 
> The iommu_attach_handle is expected only when an iopf-capable domain is
> attached to the device or PASID. The iommu_report_device_fault() treats
> it as a fault when a fault occurs, but no iopf-capable domain is
> attached.
> 
>> Add this handle when the
>> replacing hwpt has a valid iommufd fault object. Remove it when we
>> release ownership of the group.
> 
> The iommu_attach_handle is managed by the caller (iommufd here for
> example). Therefore, before iommu_attach_handle tries to attach a domain
> to an iopf-capable device or pasid, it should allocate the handle and

Correct:

"... attach an iopf-capable domain to device or pasid ..."

Sorry for the typo.

> pass it to the domain attachment interfaces. Conversely, the handle can
> only be freed after the domain is detached.
> 
> Thanks,
> baolu