From: Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:13:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baced047981ff5fce633156e3e374dfd@overdrivepizza.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202210182218.56AD2871@keescook>
On 2022-10-18 22:19, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:48:42PM -0700, Joao Moreira wrote:
>> > > Is it useful to get the compiler to emit 0xcc with
>> > > -fpatchable-function-entry under any circumstance? I can probably
>> > > change
>> > > that quickly if needed/useful.
>> >
>> > Having it emit 0xcc for the bytes in front of the symbol might be
>> > interesting. It would mean a few kernel changes, but nothing too hard.
Should I push for this within clang? I have the patch semi-ready (below)
and would have some cycles this week for polishing it.
>> >
>> > That is, -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M gets us N-M bytes in at the
>> > start of the symbol and M bytes in front of it. The N-M bytes at the
>> > start of the function *are* executed and should obviously not become
>> > 0xcc (GCC keeps them 0x90 while LLVM makes them large NOPs).
>>
>> Uhum, all makes sense. I drafted something here:
>>
>> https://github.com/lvwr/llvm-project/commits/joao/int3
>>
>> Let me know if this works for you or if there is something that should
>> be
>> tweaked, like adding a specific flag and such. This currently emits
>> 0xcc
>> instead of 0x90 for the nops before the function entry symbol for
>> kernel
>> code on x86-64. It seems to be working (see generated snippet below),
>> but
>> let me know otherwise:
>>
>> Generated with -fpatchable-function-entry=10,5
>>
>> Disassembly of section .text:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <save_processor_state-0x5>:
>> 0: cc int3
>> 1: cc int3
>> 2: cc int3
>> 3: cc int3
>> 4: cc int3
>>
>> 0000000000000005 <save_processor_state>:
>> 5: 0f 1f 44 00 08 nopl 0x8(%rax,%rax,1)
>> a: 41 57 push %r15
>> c: 41 56 push %r14
>
> Cool! I like that. Assuming objtool doesn't freak out, that seems like
> a
> nice way to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 13:35 [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 14:43 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 15:58 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 17:20 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:33 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 21:27 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19 5:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 5:14 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 21:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 5:05 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 15:22 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-20 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 19:59 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:32 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 19:35 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 5:00 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 20:17 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 4:48 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-31 19:13 ` Joao Moreira [this message]
2022-11-01 21:39 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 21:50 ` Joao Moreira
2024-05-06 17:36 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-07 1:45 ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19 5:18 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 5:16 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-20 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19 7:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-21 23:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-22 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-24 17:15 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-24 18:38 ` Joao Moreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baced047981ff5fce633156e3e374dfd@overdrivepizza.com \
--to=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox