public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:13:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <baced047981ff5fce633156e3e374dfd@overdrivepizza.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202210182218.56AD2871@keescook>

On 2022-10-18 22:19, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:48:42PM -0700, Joao Moreira wrote:
>> > > Is it useful to get the compiler to emit 0xcc with
>> > > -fpatchable-function-entry under any circumstance? I can probably
>> > > change
>> > > that quickly if needed/useful.
>> >
>> > Having it emit 0xcc for the bytes in front of the symbol might be
>> > interesting. It would mean a few kernel changes, but nothing too hard.

Should I push for this within clang? I have the patch semi-ready (below) 
and would have some cycles this week for polishing it.

>> >
>> > That is, -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M gets us N-M bytes in at the
>> > start of the symbol and M bytes in front of it. The N-M bytes at the
>> > start of the function *are* executed and should obviously not become
>> > 0xcc (GCC keeps them 0x90 while LLVM makes them large NOPs).
>> 
>> Uhum, all makes sense. I drafted something here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/lvwr/llvm-project/commits/joao/int3
>> 
>> Let me know if this works for you or if there is something that should 
>> be
>> tweaked, like adding a specific flag and such. This currently emits 
>> 0xcc
>> instead of 0x90 for the nops before the function entry symbol for 
>> kernel
>> code on x86-64. It seems to be working (see generated snippet below), 
>> but
>> let me know otherwise:
>> 
>> Generated with -fpatchable-function-entry=10,5
>> 
>> Disassembly of section .text:
>> 
>> 0000000000000000 <save_processor_state-0x5>:
>>    0:   cc                      int3
>>    1:   cc                      int3
>>    2:   cc                      int3
>>    3:   cc                      int3
>>    4:   cc                      int3
>> 
>> 0000000000000005 <save_processor_state>:
>>    5:   0f 1f 44 00 08          nopl   0x8(%rax,%rax,1)
>>    a:   41 57                   push   %r15
>>    c:   41 56                   push   %r14
> 
> Cool! I like that. Assuming objtool doesn't freak out, that seems like 
> a
> nice way to go.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-31 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 13:35 [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 14:43 ` David Laight
2022-10-18 15:58   ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 17:20     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09       ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19  5:33         ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 21:27     ` David Laight
2022-10-18 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:31     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19  5:22       ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 11:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19  5:14     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 19:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 21:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19  5:05     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 12:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19 15:22         ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-20 11:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 19:59   ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19  5:32     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19 19:35       ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19  5:00     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-18 20:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 20:17     ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-18 20:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-19  4:48         ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19  5:19           ` Kees Cook
2022-10-31 19:13             ` Joao Moreira [this message]
2022-11-01 21:39               ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 21:50                 ` Joao Moreira
2024-05-06 17:36                   ` Kees Cook
2024-05-07  1:45                     ` Joao Moreira
2022-10-19  5:18         ` Kees Cook
2022-10-19  5:16     ` Kees Cook
2022-10-20 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-18 23:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-19  7:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-21 23:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-22 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-24 17:15     ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-10-24 18:38       ` Joao Moreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=baced047981ff5fce633156e3e374dfd@overdrivepizza.com \
    --to=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox