From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934820AbdEVOWT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 10:22:19 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:51191 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934523AbdEVOWR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 10:22:17 -0400 Subject: Re: vhost/scsi: Delete error messages for failed memory allocations in five functions To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , LKML References: <20170522094320.GE12205@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <557bdff4-6dc2-756d-0d59-9f688ef11f0a@users.sourceforge.net> <20170522112320.GA22806@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20170522140935.GB1021@stefanha-x1.localdomain> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:21:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170522140935.GB1021@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+j4XoHfm8GrTOd4Pj0Yp6d2/e0N3C9n0NIQQRiJf9A/1dIKAROI sDBqdQuprJO9TWl+FW750w2WPS6+01ISD/1IdvnYbaA3yXz+JsgPY2hEyiUFI0+ZINJOBUd wDrxe8VEzwObYH9W9EafQl1zttMSaH69crEg376illkpnt7WMgXCPfQooo2rZ9M/cZ7U42X odr5WAKek95OZZcLqbYBg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:KbE+TodYVQM=:Pun1PmzVaaPlkIYBfFeGWc lQonlCJAJMJdas/yVazaDrbge+0yCSa/fzxTLmWRGFyIx58zkSvzOcnbXnWYXwmt34VGOOvc0 j9ydYPhwUWyDDJ9SFiC2QVCTXwf1JbuJ02gMCtsV+smADX9AlD7nH3S7YWld2SbTJnnuQL1WK YnyEQMVWnXDeR7EKmakTxXwzu1EzhTCbPUx+8BFAeQNtijOQZmHwo5YcVS1KFcLSGuGpHOdut 8+aIq7v/BHv9VpzvvJYgaw8DPmyXKGAZHvTXMQ/eLssf/9I46ViUIY2t87yj1LdbbC5x5PapZ rni3k3eH7sVn/SBoIe+jOh5Ynb9m+Jm8VGWwEBVx4hFHRQzd0qKJ+N6+7Zx9k5yh7ZlZOMyTf VDj0k5caxSKBno25dHWPcUYUmlASXdR+gdCEGMo6VJlMK2dj03qdkoT68FtvdEEJit0h8R5Rz wCNbrW4I2sHDkFONFeO1lV57qU60cbs9KQE4aSz5OJbNR1I1hz0Oce44zvjhSWtEeip2jed0T BBz88DZkCNc7p84flAqS98c+NfEhLKZChxYHcBCQr3GTrrVgf6PqxBnYVjoA7Pwcej6zhQFo5 v1UTvTxYOFQ3Yv2OvNBwxqW+qS7DnBzhRrdv0yz3O6zlKfndSRka/ODJaj/3rMt9OS/Sv+smo aHpgTO9nZPZ2ERrIXRWKBbckqeqXs8appfYpM3HH3+0XwCXWrE8C/rY4GK/EUTSpy1B8Rz/ZH cdntYh3D8rwQdRyV7lTwknpNPw5Ckp3HW42RHQg2BgoZqviqwx0Jng8DpTowo0s5xkauzezqK 6YndB1N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > No objection from me but please make sure to keep vq_err(). How long should I wait before I may dare to send another variant for the discussed update suggestion? Which commit message would be acceptable then for this update step? Regards, Markus