From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: "Yunseong Kim" <yskelg@gmail.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexandra Winter" <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thorsten Winkler" <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/netiucv: handle memory allocation failure in conn_action_start()
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:27:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb03a384-b2c4-438f-b36b-a4af33a95b60@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240623131154.36458-2-yskelg@gmail.com>
> This patch handle potential null pointer dereference in
> iucv_path_connect(), When iucv_path_alloc() fails to allocate memory
> for 'rc'.
1. Can a wording approach (like the following) be a better change description?
A null pointer is stored in the data structure member “path” after a call
of the function “iucv_path_alloc” failed. This pointer was passed to
a subsequent call of the function “iucv_path_connect” where an undesirable
dereference will be performed then.
Thus add a corresponding return value check.
2. May the proposed error message be omitted
(because a memory allocation failure might have been reported
by an other function call already)?
3. Is there a need to adjust the return type of the function “conn_action_start”?
4. Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes”) accordingly?
5. Under which circumstances will development interests grow for increasing
the application of scope-based resource management?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L8
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-23 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-23 13:11 [PATCH] s390/netiucv: handle memory allocation failure in conn_action_start() yskelg
2024-06-23 14:27 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2024-06-24 18:00 ` Yunseong Kim
2024-06-25 9:08 ` Alexandra Winter
2024-06-25 15:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb03a384-b2c4-438f-b36b-a4af33a95b60@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shjy180909@gmail.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yskelg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox