From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: leitao@debian.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
shuah@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, liam@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 09:54:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb0e5af8-3b24-471a-856f-2284a90a380c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512124837.38883-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On 5/12/26 14:48, Lance Yang wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:17:00AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 5/11/26 17:38, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> When get_hwpoison_page() returns a negative value, distinguish
>>> reserved pages from other failure cases by reporting MF_MSG_KERNEL
>>> instead of MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON. Reserved pages belong to the kernel
>>> and should be classified accordingly for proper handling.
>>>
>>> Sample PG_reserved before the get_hwpoison_page() call. In the
>>> MF_COUNT_INCREASED path get_any_page() can drop the caller's
>>> reference before returning -EIO, after which the underlying page may
>>> have been freed and reallocated with page->flags reset; reading
>>> PageReserved(p) at that point would observe stale or unrelated state.
>>> The pre-call snapshot reflects what the page actually was at the
>>> time of the failure event.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory-failure.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>> index 866c4428ac7ef..f112fb27a8ff6 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>> @@ -2348,6 +2348,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>>> unsigned long page_flags;
>>> bool retry = true;
>>> int hugetlb = 0;
>>> + bool is_reserved;
>>>
>>> if (!sysctl_memory_failure_recovery)
>>> panic("Memory failure on page %lx", pfn);
>>> @@ -2411,6 +2412,18 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>>> * In fact it's dangerous to directly bump up page count from 0,
>>> * that may make page_ref_freeze()/page_ref_unfreeze() mismatch.
>>> */
>>> + /*
>>> + * Pages with PG_reserved set are not currently managed by the
>>> + * page allocator (memblock-reserved memory, driver reservations,
>>> + * etc.), so classify them as kernel-owned for reporting.
>>> + *
>>> + * Sample the flag before get_hwpoison_page(): in the
>>> + * MF_COUNT_INCREASED path, get_any_page() can drop the caller's
>>> + * reference before returning -EIO, after which page->flags may
>>> + * have been reset by the allocator.
>>> + */
>>> + is_reserved = PageReserved(p);
>>> +
>>> res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags);
>>> if (!res) {
>>> if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
>>> @@ -2432,7 +2445,11 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>>> }
>>> goto unlock_mutex;
>>> } else if (res < 0) {
>>> - res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED);
>>> + if (is_reserved)
>>> + res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_KERNEL, MF_IGNORED);
>>> + else
>>> + res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON,
>>> + MF_IGNORED);
>>> goto unlock_mutex;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's a bit odd that we need this handling when we already have handling for
>> reserved pages in error_states[].
>>
>> HWPoisonHandlable() would always essentially reject PG_reserved pages. So
>> __get_hwpoison_page() ... would always fail? Making
>> get_hwpoison_page()->get_any_page() always fail?
>>
>> But then, we never call identify_page_state()? And never call me_kernel()?
>
> Looks like we never get that far ...
Right, likely that should be removed+cleaned up then.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 15:38 [PATCH v6 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 12:48 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-13 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-12 13:04 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-13 7:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 17:58 ` jane.chu
2026-05-13 7:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/memory-failure: classify get_any_page() failures by reason Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 8:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 13:33 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-13 11:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-13 15:07 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-05-12 8:22 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-12 13:05 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb0e5af8-3b24-471a-856f-2284a90a380c@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox