From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bp@alien8.de, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
dave.jiang@intel.com, irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com,
david.e.box@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86/fpu: Remove unnecessary CPUID level check
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 09:46:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb937b3f-e595-4aa8-a6e5-08bdbd4702bf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zz9VjVKbzMehRTjA@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 789 bytes --]
On 11/21/24 07:45, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> The CPUID level dependency table will entirely zap X86_FEATURE_XSAVE
>
> What table is that? XSAVE depends on FXSR, but I can't find anything that clears
> X86_FEATURE_XSAVE if cpuid_level < XSTATE_CPUID. Even if it did, dropping a
> sanity check in a one-time path adds risk for almost no reward.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c::cpuid_dependent_features[]
It's hard to find because it hard-codes the leaf number:
{ X86_FEATURE_XSAVE, 0x0000000d },
Fixing that was my initial motivation for this series.
As for removing the checks, I'd much rather have a super generic check
in the CPUID helpers that have all the callers code something.
Something like the attached patch?
[-- Attachment #2: cpuid_count-warn.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2247 bytes --]
---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h | 6 ++++++
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~cpuid_count-warn arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~cpuid_count-warn 2024-11-22 08:50:12.618186610 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h 2024-11-22 09:10:12.112217942 -0800
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ native_cpuid_reg(edx)
#define __cpuid native_cpuid
#endif
+extern void check_cpuid_level(unsigned int level);
+
/*
* Generic CPUID function
* clear %ecx since some cpus (Cyrix MII) do not set or clear %ecx
@@ -73,6 +75,8 @@ static inline void cpuid(unsigned int op
unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx)
{
+ check_cpuid_level(op);
+
*eax = op;
*ecx = 0;
__cpuid(eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
@@ -83,6 +87,8 @@ static inline void cpuid_count(unsigned
unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx)
{
+ check_cpuid_level(op);
+
*eax = op;
*ecx = count;
__cpuid(eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~cpuid_count-warn arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~cpuid_count-warn 2024-11-22 09:07:43.922591720 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c 2024-11-22 09:42:48.950952538 -0800
@@ -2425,3 +2425,41 @@ void __init arch_cpu_finalize_init(void)
*/
mem_encrypt_init();
}
+
+void check_cpuid_level(unsigned int leaf)
+{
+ unsigned int region = leaf >> 4;
+ int max_leaf;
+
+ /*
+ * The max leaf in a region is discovered from the first
+ * leaf. Allow this kind of discovery without checks:
+ */
+ if (!(leaf & GENMASK(3, 0)))
+ return;
+
+ switch (region) {
+ case 0x0000:
+ max_leaf = boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level;
+ break;
+ case 0x8000:
+ max_leaf = boot_cpu_data.extended_cpuid_level;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* Only check the basic and extended regions: */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Skip checks before ->cpuid_level is populated
+ * and on CPUs without CPUID support:
+ */
+ if (!max_leaf)
+ return;
+
+ if (leaf <= max_leaf)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "CPUID read leaf 0x%x above max supported leaf: 0x%x",
+ leaf, max_leaf);
+}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 19:53 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/cpu: Move MWAIT leaf definition to common header Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:24 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/cpu: Remove unnecessary MwAIT leaf checks Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/acpi: Check MWAIT feature instead of CPUID level Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-21 21:46 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/cpu: Refresh DCA leaf reading code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:11 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-26 3:55 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/cpu: Move TSC CPUID leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:23 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/tsc: Move away from TSC leaf magic numbers Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/tsc: Remove CPUID "frequency" " Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:37 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/fpu: Move CPUID leaf definitions to common code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:43 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/fpu: Remove unnecessary CPUID level check Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-22 17:46 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/cpu: Make all all CPUID leaf names consistent Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 20:23 ` Dave Jiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-30 21:33 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-10-30 21:33 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/fpu: Remove unnecessary CPUID level check Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb937b3f-e595-4aa8-a6e5-08bdbd4702bf@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox