Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC

["Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Boris,

     Thank you so much for review comments and your time...

On 14/4/2020 3:21 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hello Ramuthevar,
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:24:33 +0800
> "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX"
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.read_byte = lgm_read_byte;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.read_buf = lgm_read_buf;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.write_buf = lgm_write_buf;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.select_chip = lgm_select_chip;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.dev_ready = lgm_dev_ready;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.cmd_ctrl = lgm_cmd_ctrl;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.chip_delay = 30;
>> +	lgm_host->chip.legacy.dummy_controller.ops = &lgm_nand_controller_ops;
>> +
> Seriously, what's not clear in [1]? Okay, let's say you overlooked this
> comment, isn't the name of the field explicit enough? We received a
> few other drivers implementing the legacy interface in the last few
> months so maybe there's something to improve on our end (update the
> doc, move legacy drivers to a legacy sub-dir?).
Understood the legacy to latest implementation based ->exec_op(), Thanks!
>
> Back to more constructive comment now: please implement ->exec_op() to
> replace those legacy hooks.

Agreed, will do the implementation of exec_op() hook and update the patches.

Regards
Vadivel
>
> Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc1/source/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h#L987