From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>,
konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, andersson@kernel.org,
andi.shyti@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
agross@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux@treblig.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Frank.Li@nxp.com,
konradybcio@kernel.org
Cc: quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:54:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb9e6ba2-4aeb-40ee-b123-9c59a0efa098@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cc7d427-34c6-45c2-a747-f71112833773@quicinc.com>
On 10/09/2024 11:09, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Thanks Krzysztof.
>
> On 9/7/2024 2:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/09/2024 21:14, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>> Adds qcom,shared-se flag usage. Use this when particular I2C serial
>>> controller needs to be shared between two subsystems.
>>
>> <form letter>
>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
>> and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might
>> happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
>> entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
>> kernel.
>>
>> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
>> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
>> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
>> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
>> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
>> patches to the patchset.
>> </form letter>
>>
>> You already got this comment, so how many times it has to be repeated?
>> Your process is just wrong if you do not use the tools for this.
>>
> Sorry, I was already using scripts/get_maintainer.pl but i kept everyone
> into To list (That's my mistake here). I shall keep maintainers in TO
> list and rest in CC list.
No, To or Cc does not matter. Your list is just incomplete.
>
> Question: With <Form Letter> , are you asking to add letter in this
> first patch ? I have cover letter, but it will get removed when patch
> gets merged. Please help suggest and clarify.
No, it's just template. Form letter... I am just bored to repeat the
same comment.
>>
>>>
>>> SE = Serial Engine, meant for I2C controller here.
>>> TRE = Transfer Ring Element, refers to Queued Descriptor.
>>>
>>> Example :
>>> Two clients from different SS can share an I2C SE for same slave device
>>
>> What is SS?
>>
> SS = Subsystem (EE - Execution Environment, can be Apps
> processor/TZ/Modem/ADSP etc). Let me add this too in next patch.
Yes, please explain in the binding itself.
>>> OR their owned slave devices.
>>> Assume I2C Slave EEPROM device connected with I2C controller.
>>> Each client from ADSP SS and APPS Linux SS can perform i2c transactions.
>>> This gets serialized by lock TRE + DMA Transfers + Unlock TRE at HW level.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
>>> index 9f66a3bb1f80..ae423127f736 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
>>> @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ properties:
>>> power-domains:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>>
>>> + qcom,shared-se:
>>> + description: True if I2C needs to be shared between two or more subsystems.
>>
>> What is a subsystem? With commit msg I still do not understand this.
> SS = Subsystem (EE - Execution Environment, can be Apps
> processor/TZ/Modem/ADSP etc). Let me add EE too with full form.
>> Maybe presence of hwlock defines it anyway, so this is redundant?
> No, this flag is required. As hwlock comes into picture if this flag is
Flag is required? By what? Sorry, you push your downstream solution to us.
> defined. So flag is acting as a condition to take hwlock TRE
> descriptor(transfer ring element). Hope i could answer your query.
Hm, not sure, maybe indeed hwlock would not be enough. However I think
existing binding misses hwlock property.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 19:14 [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable shared SE support over I2C Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-06 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-07 9:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-10 9:09 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-10 9:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-09-10 13:44 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-06 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dma: gpi: Add Lock and Unlock TRE support to access SE exclusively Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-06 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] soc: qcom: geni-se: Export function geni_se_clks_off() Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-09 11:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-10 9:11 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-06 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Enable i2c controller sharing between two subsystems Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-07 7:56 ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-10 13:42 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-09 8:54 ` neil.armstrong
2024-09-09 9:18 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-09 11:37 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-09 12:53 ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-10 13:39 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-10 9:12 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-09 13:04 ` neil.armstrong
2024-09-10 9:15 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-10 9:52 ` neil.armstrong
2024-09-18 12:20 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
2024-09-10 9:12 ` Mukesh Kumar Savaliya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb9e6ba2-4aeb-40ee-b123-9c59a0efa098@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vdadhani@quicinc.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox