From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yuzhao@google.com, usamaarif642@gmail.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
baohua@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
liam@infradead.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, ljs@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: restrict zero-page remapping to underused THP splits
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 15:44:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbab2b63-59fd-4f21-b991-53ae22588704@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574fc329-bf2d-4686-9f15-b1709432326e@kernel.org>
On 5/11/26 15:42, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 5/11/26 15:10, Usama Arif wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/05/2026 07:36, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, but that's what the users ask for: if there is a chance to deduplicate
>>> memory, it shall be deduplicated asap.
>>>
>>>
>>> Right, the probability is low, and it would change existing semantics, breaking
>>> existing users.
>>>
>>> In addition, we would have to add large folio support for KSM, which I rather
>>> would avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>> Right, but that's what you get with KSM: bad performance if there is a chance to
>>> deduplicate :)
>>>
>>> (and bad performance from scanning overhead)
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not just the zero page, but really any page content. The zero page is
>>> currently only "special" after we added conditional support to deduplicate to
>>> the shared zeropage in KSM. The shrinker doesn't help for any other page content
>>> besides zero-filled.
>>>
>>> Further, the shrinker is something system-wide, whereby KSM is usually only
>>> enabled for selected VMAs (with some exceptions nowadays).
>>>
>>> Also note that KSM deduplicates independent of the folio size: not just THPs,
>>> but really any (large) folio. Yes, it splits large folios, but that's really
>>> just to keep the T in THP.
>>>
>>>
>>> Right, and it makes KSM more THP aware. Which is something I would avoid right now.
>>>
>>>
>>> That would change the semantics where, for example, where we expect that memory
>>> was deduplicated after a KSM run.
>>>
>>> VMs (where KSM is usually employed) are expected to be mostly backed by THPs:
>>> except where we can deduplicate memory. Skipping THPs would essentially break
>>> the main use case for KSM :)
>>>
>>> Does that make sense?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, all of above makes sense. But I feel like this means someone should not
>> set THP policy to always and enable KSM together.
>
> IIRC, QEMU will, as default, set MADV_HUGEPAGE and MADV_MERGEABLE :)
>
> (KSM itself later has to be enabled manually on a system level)
Digging around, RHEL documents that one might want to consider disabling THPs
for performance:
"As KSM can reduce the occurence of transparent huge pages, you may want to
disable it before enabling THP." [1]
But that doesn't mean that some people are using that combination.
In the end "some THPs" is better than "no THPs" :)
[1]
https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/virtualization_tuning_and_optimization_guide/sect-virtualization_tuning_optimization_guide-memory-huge_pages
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 17:05 [RFC] mm: restrict zero-page remapping to underused THP splits Nico Pache
2026-05-08 21:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-09 8:25 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-10 11:39 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-11 6:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 13:10 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-11 13:42 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-11 14:15 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-11 18:40 ` Nico Pache
2026-05-09 3:21 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-11 18:42 ` Nico Pache
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbab2b63-59fd-4f21-b991-53ae22588704@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox