public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 27/31] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:58:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbd0071f-753e-4479-b259-991501781aec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250829193346.31565-28-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

On 8/29/25 12:33 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> L3 monitor features are enumerated during resctrl initialization
> and rmid_ptrs[] that tracks all RMIDs and depends on the
> number of supported RMIDs is allocated during this time.
> 
> Telemetry monitor features are enumerated during first resctrl mount and
> may support a different number of RMIDs compared to L3 monitor features.
> 
> Delay allocation and initialization of rmid_ptrs[] until first mount.
> Since the number of RMIDs cannot change on later mounts, keep the same
> set of rmid_ptrs[] until resctrl_exit().

Another strong reason is that the limbo handler keeps running after resctrl is
unmounted and may likely need to access rmid_ptrs[] as it keeps tracking
busy RMIDs after unmount.


> 
> Rename routines to match what they now do:
> dom_data_init() -> setup_rmid_lru_list()
> dom_data_exit() -> free_rmid_lru_list()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/resctrl/internal.h |  4 ++++
>  fs/resctrl/monitor.c  | 50 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c |  7 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/internal.h b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
> index 7c37142df1cc..6dde28d9cfac 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -357,6 +357,10 @@ int closids_supported(void);
>  
>  void closid_free(int closid);
>  
> +int setup_rmid_lru_list(void);
> +
> +void free_rmid_lru_list(void);
> +
>  int alloc_rmid(u32 closid);
>  
>  void free_rmid(u32 closid, u32 rmid);
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> index d5b96aca5d03..636342fad5a4 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -802,20 +802,24 @@ void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *dom, unsigned long del
>  		schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dom->mbm_over, delay);
>  }
>  
> -static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +int setup_rmid_lru_list(void)
>  {
>  	u32 idx_limit = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
>  	struct rmid_entry *entry = NULL;
> -	int err = 0, i;
>  	u32 idx;
> +	int i;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +	/*
> +	 * Called on every mount, but the number of RMIDs cannot change
> +	 * after the first mount, so keep using the same set of rmid_ptrs[]
> +	 * until resctrl_exit().
> +	 */
> +	if (rmid_ptrs)
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	rmid_ptrs = kcalloc(idx_limit, sizeof(struct rmid_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rmid_ptrs) {
> -		err = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto out_unlock;
> -	}
> +	if (!rmid_ptrs)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < idx_limit; i++) {
>  		entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
> @@ -828,30 +832,21 @@ static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	/*
>  	 * RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID and RESCTRL_RESERVED_RMID are special and
>  	 * are always allocated. These are used for the rdtgroup_default
> -	 * control group, which will be setup later in resctrl_init().
> +	 * control group, which was setup earlier in rdtgroup_setup_default().
>  	 */
>  	idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID,
>  					   RESCTRL_RESERVED_RMID);
>  	entry = __rmid_entry(idx);
>  	list_del(&entry->list);
>  
> -out_unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> -
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void dom_data_exit(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +void free_rmid_lru_list(void)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> -
> -	if (!r->mon_capable)
> -		goto out_unlock;
> -

Can use resctrl_arch_mon_capable() instead to keep this check while maintaining
symmetry with setup_rmid_lru_list() that will make this easier to follow? 
Having the resctrl_arch_mon_capable() check within setup_rmid_lru_list() will 
also help.


>  	kfree(rmid_ptrs);
>  	rmid_ptrs = NULL;
> -
> -out_unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>  }
>  
> @@ -914,7 +909,8 @@ bool resctrl_is_mon_event_enabled(enum resctrl_event_id eventid)
>   * resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init() - Initialise global monitoring structures.
>   *
>   * Allocate and initialise global monitor resources that do not belong to a
> - * specific domain. i.e. the rmid_ptrs[] used for the limbo and free lists.
> + * specific domain. i.e. the closid_num_dirty_rmid[] used to find the CLOSID
> + * with the cleanest set of RMIDs.
>   * Called once during boot after the struct rdt_resource's have been configured
>   * but before the filesystem is mounted.
>   * Resctrl's cpuhp callbacks may be called before this point to bring a domain
> @@ -925,7 +921,6 @@ bool resctrl_is_mon_event_enabled(enum resctrl_event_id eventid)
>  int resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct rdt_resource *r = resctrl_arch_get_resource(RDT_RESOURCE_L3);
> -	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!r->mon_capable)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -947,15 +942,6 @@ int resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init(void)
>  		closid_num_dirty_rmid = tmp;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = dom_data_init(r);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> -			kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> -			closid_num_dirty_rmid = NULL;
> -		}
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID)) {
>  		mon_event_all[QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID].configurable = true;
>  		resctrl_file_fflags_init("mbm_total_bytes_config",
> @@ -977,12 +963,8 @@ int resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init(void)
>  
>  void resctrl_l3_mon_resource_exit(void)
>  {
> -	struct rdt_resource *r = resctrl_arch_get_resource(RDT_RESOURCE_L3);
> -

As mentioned earlier, please try to maintain symmetry with resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init().

>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
>  		kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
>  		closid_num_dirty_rmid = NULL;
>  	}
> -
> -	dom_data_exit(r);
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 3201e9cad8da..886de0e01e8a 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,12 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable()) {
> +		ret = setup_rmid_lru_list();
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;
> +	}

As mentioned earlier, please try to make code symmetrical to make this
easier to understand. As this is written the reader sees that 
setup_rmid_lru_list() needs to be protected by resctrl_arch_mon_capable()
while free_rmid_lru_list() can always be called whether system is
monitoring capable or not. This creates confusion that symmetrical code
can help with.

> +
>  	ret = rdtgroup_setup_root(ctx);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -4408,4 +4414,5 @@ void resctrl_exit(void)
>  	 */
>  
>  	resctrl_l3_mon_resource_exit();
> +	free_rmid_lru_list();
>  }

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29 19:33 [PATCH v9 00/31] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 01/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 02/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 03/31] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 04/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 05/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 06/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 07/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 08/31] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 09/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr instead of struct rdt_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 10/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 11/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-09-09 21:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 12/31] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-09-09 22:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 13/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-09-09 22:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 14/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-09-09 22:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 15/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-09-09 22:17   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 16/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope monitor Tony Luck
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 17/31] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-09-01  8:39   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-03 18:12     ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-10  3:39       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 18/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of events for guid 0x26696143 and 0x26557651 Tony Luck
2025-09-01  8:57   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-10  3:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 19/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-09-10  3:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 20/31] x86/resctrl: Find and enable usable telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-09-01  8:58   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-03 18:19     ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-10  3:40       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 21/31] x86/resctrl: Read " Tony Luck
2025-09-01  9:15   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-09-03 18:24     ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-10  3:43       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 22/31] x86/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-09-10 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 23/31] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-09-10 15:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 24/31] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by telemetry resources Tony Luck
2025-09-10 15:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 25/31] fs/resctrl: Move allocation/free of closid_num_dirty_rmid Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:55   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-11 22:26     ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-12 17:19       ` Luck, Tony
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 26/31] fs,x86/resctrl: Compute number of RMIDs as minimum across resources Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 27/31] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:58   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 28/31] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 29/31] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create architecture specific debugfs area Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:58   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 30/31] x86/resctrl: Add debugfs files to show telemetry aggregator status Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:59   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-29 19:33 ` [PATCH v9 31/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Update Documentation for package events Tony Luck
2025-09-10 17:59   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-03 18:27 ` [PATCH v9 00/31] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bbd0071f-753e-4479-b259-991501781aec@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox