Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] PCI: Define Intel PCI IDs and use them in drivers

[Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>]

On 6/28/23 16:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> PCI IDs for Intel HDA are duplicated across quite a few drivers, due to
>> various configurations and historical reasons. Currently almost all uses
>> of HDA PCI IDs have corresponding comment telling which platform it is.
>> Additionally there are some inconsistencies between drivers about which
>> ID corresponds to which device.
>>
>> Simplify things, by adding PCI IDs to global header and make use of them
>> in drivers. This allows for removal of comments by having IDs themselves
>> being self explanatory. Additionally it allows for removal of existing
>> inconsistencies by having one source of truth.
> 
> I'm in favour of this series. It allows to use PCI_DEVICE_DATA() in many places.
> With that said, I think you can also add some more definitions to PCI IDs header
> for the sake of being able to use that macro.

I don't have any objections on the change.

The big open is how we add new definitions without a 3-way deadlock
between PCI, sound and ASoC trees, and how those definitions can be
added to the -stable trees.

This isn't an hypothetical case, we have 2 pending submissions for
LunarLake [1] and ArrowLake [2] which will be provided as soon as the
merge window closes.

It's not clear to me if Bjorn is ok to let those audio-specific PCI IDs
go the audio trees, and how things would work between Mark and Takashi.

[1] https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4425
[2] https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4437