From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] hwmon: (lm90) Use edge-triggered interrupt
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:46:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc3e3595-fe10-c7ae-9560-0c7676facba2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617141300.GA1366442@roeck-us.net>
17.06.2021 17:13, Guenter Roeck пишет:
...
>> This is a device-tree based system, in particular it's NVIDIA Tegra30
>> Nexus 7. The interrupt support was originally added to the lm90 driver
>> by Wei Ni who works at NVIDIA and did it for the Tegra boards. The Tegra
>> device-trees are specifying the trigger mask and apparently they all are
>> cargo-culted and wrong because they use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, while it
>
> Be fair, no one is perfect.
This is a very minor problem, so no wonder that nobody noticed or
bothered to fix it yet. I'm just clarifying the status here.
>> should be IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING.
>
> It should probably be both IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING and IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING,
For now I see that the rising edge isn't needed, the TEMP_ALERT goes
HIGH by itself when temperature backs to normal. But I will try to
double check.
> and the interrupt handler should call hwmon_notify_event() instead of
> clogging the kernel log, but that should be done in a separate patch.
Thank you for suggestion, I will take a look.
> Anyway, the tegra30 dts files in the upstream kernel either use
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW or no interrupts for nct1008. The Nexus 7 dts file
> in the upstream kernel has no interrupt configured (and coincidentally
> it was you who added that entry). Where do you see IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
I have a patch that will add the interrupt property, it's stashed
locally for the next kernel release.
IIUC, it's not only the Tegra30 dts, but all the TegraXXX boards that
use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW are in the same position.
>> The IRQF flag in devm_request_threaded_irq() overrides the trigger mask
>> specified in a device-tree. IIUC, the interrupt is used only by OF-based
>> devices, hence I think we could simply remove the IRQF flag from the
>> code and fix the device-trees. Does it sound good to you?
>
> Yes, that is a better approach.
Thank you for reviewing this patch. I'll prepare v2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-16 19:07 [PATCH v1] hwmon: (lm90) Use edge-triggered interrupt Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-17 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-17 7:11 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-17 13:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-17 13:48 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-17 14:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-17 14:46 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2021-06-17 15:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-17 15:27 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-06-17 21:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-18 8:55 ` Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc3e3595-fe10-c7ae-9560-0c7676facba2@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox