From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E554C259C; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 13:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753797368; cv=none; b=NOO7QoviCTspbI4zntZ6KlDfdaeaB5jZsT/AXDd+5W2qsofTNGfPrghMVJxcR/WiVz0WBHMUFPBHMUBFHQJmVuseBuwH4Flfhds1O+PfcDgjxCWpheRbw3QorlyfF6XNOibo52RQLs8KoWcHA4/6L6SZtUrymnW0yJhYxQQjJiU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753797368; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BETeNN46Ajzeu2NTK/WCecO1X5HEYVNEksT8795g6/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qT7+N9E/tFRz9X3UkABxP4NcDcVhXaCUu2RXuhKU8LRCHkXbmnua8sYaRaoIHIyP4Rw606VOZVkWSw+Rv1ah5GLs6T7ilBrhuGRlUXPr5IYoCcZhwA3q4TwihpcMuqzpH3KZM+rTBIMCUqn4IbufeCfPSAddrSvfWlDS+fHhZMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=JCYskDSC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="JCYskDSC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=TQdxKKVZ1GM7fhQqDu7S5KrsXU0ul66dbGYdSM5AmB8=; b=JCYskDSCGBuSczNjpjsQY5I19S KpaMTZOPRKIXZthIe0Ra+XbS+f14yNgQyF8RpCcM5UssF9/mKrNKvv3Fb3Yyv+m+qDKbiJsklw8zE eSBvljolvU6qo5fWYda0ckU8D4odrrnb81PLnQ48bG2eMZqCjwGD/vxbOl+vXSTo2Qq8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugko2-003CMb-PD; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:55:50 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:55:50 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Fred Chen Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Joel Stanley , Andrew Jeffery , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: santabarbara: Adjust LED configuration Message-ID: References: <20250729091351.3964939-1-fredchen.openbmc@gmail.com> <20250729091351.3964939-4-fredchen.openbmc@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250729091351.3964939-4-fredchen.openbmc@gmail.com> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 05:13:45PM +0800, Fred Chen wrote: > Add a new power fault LED on GPIOB5 and relocate the ID LED to GPIOQ4. > The ID LED is now driven by the CPLD, allowing it to reflect multiple > system states depending on CPLD logic. It would be good to add a comment about why this is not an ABI breaking change. Andrew