From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.0-rc2 seccomp_bpf user_notification_basic test hangs
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:53:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc944bc9-65aa-d00e-a2b5-ec6d769dae9a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117164531.GD17449@cisco>
On 1/17/19 9:45 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:41:59AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:27 AM Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:12:50AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:26 PM shuah <shuah@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>> I am running Linux 5.0-rc2 and not an older kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Weird. I couldn't reproduce this on 5.0-rc2, but I did see it on a
>>>> kernel without seccomp user_notif. Does the patch I sent fix it for
>>>> you? (And if so, can you take it in your tree?)
>>>
>>> I can reproduce it; you have to run it as non-root. I think your patch
>>> is necessary to get it to at least fail. The question is: what should
>>> we do about these tests that require real root? Skip them if we're not
>>> real-root, I guess?
>>
>> Hm, maybe use the XFAIL() bit of the harness?
>>
>> Perhaps it's time to make it a root-only test and do internal
>> priv-dropping to test the nnp-requiring parts? I'll add it to the TODO
>> list...
>
Yup that is a good way to handle it. Please skip the test with ksft skip
code for non-root runs.
> Ok, I'll try to send a couple of patches soon to fix some of this up.
> But at least yours should should stop things from hanging for now.
>
I am going to take Kees's patch to prevent hangs right away.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-17 0:01 Linux 5.0-rc2 seccomp_bpf user_notification_basic test hangs shuah
2019-01-17 0:30 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-17 0:44 ` Tycho Andersen
2019-01-17 1:26 ` shuah
2019-01-17 16:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-17 16:27 ` Tycho Andersen
2019-01-17 16:41 ` Kees Cook
2019-01-17 16:45 ` Tycho Andersen
2019-01-17 17:53 ` shuah [this message]
2019-01-17 16:11 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc944bc9-65aa-d00e-a2b5-ec6d769dae9a@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox