Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030619163732.12043A-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
By author:    Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to:  <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > > By author:    Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > > it.  Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > > > 
> > > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
> > 
> > We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
> 
> It still makes sense to have a CNAME for bk.kernel.org to match the
> others. Much easier to remember and guess; if you know one you can intuit
> the others.
> 

I just added bk.kernel.org -> linux.bkbits.net.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64