From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705D3C433F5 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231213AbiI3POS (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:14:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbiI3POL (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:14:11 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C82612FF03 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id n192so3498360iod.3 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=JfR2GfqXfwHVRcahJmnUzB1Y/QLxN5cyd7oQednba7g=; b=P9WWNQtWlB5f/IfBNtwL4w5+xcZ6cZI0BVKiGfdweWgPvQHQEQESV3CnmEnXNXiU+U vp+xXcUEit+8B9sj9Hh6xdpeXWF+P6xAL/QS/2JUGxfs6ia29xDNYZN4USoUdbcCO+B3 2egNXSKAYMBg8zUmbPfKgrHXmfZ2/feemYNI3gL7/71mJEbGW3bABE4qDEBKJe15hThf HVTPHWHhvFTL1eubX12elfdIi8vvHFzKCFs9WVn3Pi7pLNPzNL9294YBAquRnqs2KKaO rbw92cJxck6GdkD/dmmDOaLcK+VZcLXWLOXJkaiGGcX4OCwgWbbSrC/fLR/t5al86cv8 Syyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=JfR2GfqXfwHVRcahJmnUzB1Y/QLxN5cyd7oQednba7g=; b=uX1S4T8ebD5CVX3fzXfShOrlS3vSPpvXLbP1DLpZp6anZQrtin4Gqu1MIaW8XaxlOr Mt0/RSg22+Bf4gmfo9tjSTHowx4GXhhFuNbZ2kf9DNGNX3YZG+yZTGwm5WMjMRYDNPw9 +0NOpx2BQnIaRRHWlplbgpMoSlhsWSN/BI70LGhFKt2pC43Ye+P5fXxFpdcTTjI4z4vw Pr1Shvx3VZUZ48cTQyN7rDS7KMvM/G7ilHrBZRYP4ZWttDxThOHrJZ420WU38gJuomPC A+Gufb9qW+E+oSu+G9vW9my4BztsF1g6MZW6bD0J+CANz7bMWe8YJn6b6Oh0F+Nb9bHK kCgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1lw1+aSyX1pWEjcCYZ/l91K4pkbklEYitOjZoORQBNqCjbSA2Z 2T2CFofGHIYimFuVrxBPRZID8A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM56qoijmhJXnYPF8kxaWuSK3ez2mfK6ZmVjsiLUqUdOlYO1SRhJq4es+Rf++wuS3uh8BhpzXw== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b80a:0:b0:6a4:949:4681 with SMTP id i10-20020a6bb80a000000b006a409494681mr4032792iof.96.1664550843041; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([207.135.234.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2-20020a056e02060200b002eae6cf8898sm1052303ils.30.2022.09.30.08.14.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:13:59 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes Content-Language: en-US To: Pankaj Raghav , hch@lst.de, Keith Busch Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, gost.dev@samsung.com, snitzer@kernel.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, matias.bjorling@wdc.com, Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, pankydev8@gmail.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20220923173618.6899-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> <5e9d678f-ffea-e015-53d8-7e80f3deda1e@samsung.com> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <5e9d678f-ffea-e015-53d8-7e80f3deda1e@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/29/22 12:31 AM, Pankaj Raghav wrote: >> Hi Jens, >> Please consider this patch series for the 6.1 release. >> > > Hi Jens, Christoph, and Keith, > All the patches have a Reviewed-by tag at this point. Can we queue this up > for 6.1? It's getting pretty late for 6.1 and I'd really like to have both Christoph and Martin sign off on these changes. -- Jens Axboe