From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Gabriel Marin <gmx@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf/core: Invoke pmu::sched_task callback for per-cpu events
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:39:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd97ab7c-039c-b968-3008-8bcd51700c8c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgwmXmyUd4Y==F120BsAx2iWw6h9D+BB6D_FDw1-7SxBw@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/5/2020 10:54 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> -void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu)
>> +void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide)
>> {
>> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
>>
>> - if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++)
>> - list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
>> + cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++;
>>
>> - this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
>> + if (systemwide) {
>> + this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
>> + list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
> You need to check the value and make sure it's added only once.
Right, maybe we have to add a new variable for that.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 6586f7e71cfb..63c9b87cab5e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event
*event)
cpuhw->bhrb_context = event->ctx;
}
cpuhw->bhrb_users++;
- perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu, !(event->attach_state &
PERF_ATTACH_TASK));
}
static void power_pmu_bhrb_disable(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 444e5f061d04..a34b90c7fa6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1022,9 +1022,9 @@ pebs_update_state(bool needed_cb, struct
cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
if (needed_cb != pebs_needs_sched_cb(cpuc)) {
if (!needed_cb)
- perf_sched_cb_inc(pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(pmu, !(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK));
else
- perf_sched_cb_dec(pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_dec(pmu, !(event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK));
update = true;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 8961653c5dd2..8d4d02cde3d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
*/
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline && event->attr.precise_ip > 0)
cpuc->lbr_pebs_users++;
- perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu, !(event->attach_state &
PERF_ATTACH_TASK));
if (!cpuc->lbr_users++ && !event->total_time_running)
intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
cpuc->lbr_users--;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_users < 0);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_pebs_users < 0);
- perf_sched_cb_dec(event->ctx->pmu);
+ perf_sched_cb_dec(event->ctx->pmu, !(event->attach_state &
PERF_ATTACH_TASK));
}
static inline bool vlbr_exclude_host(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index a1b91f2de264..14f936385cc8 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -875,6 +875,7 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
struct list_head sched_cb_entry;
int sched_cb_usage;
+ int sched_cb_sw_usage;
int online;
/*
@@ -967,8 +968,8 @@ extern const struct perf_event_attr
*perf_event_attrs(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_print_debug(void);
extern void perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu);
extern void perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu);
-extern void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu);
+extern void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide);
+extern void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide);
extern int perf_event_task_disable(void);
extern int perf_event_task_enable(void);
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 66a9bd71f3da..af75859c9138 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3484,22 +3484,32 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct
task_struct *task, int ctxn,
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, sched_cb_list);
-void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu)
+void perf_sched_cb_dec(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+ --cpuctx->sched_cb_usage;
+
+ if (!systemwide)
+ return;
+
this_cpu_dec(perf_sched_cb_usages);
- if (!--cpuctx->sched_cb_usage)
+ if (!--cpuctx->sched_cb_sw_usage)
list_del(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry);
}
-void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu)
+void perf_sched_cb_inc(struct pmu *pmu, bool systemwide)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
- if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++)
+ cpuctx->sched_cb_usage++;
+
+ if (!systemwide)
+ return;
+
+ if (!cpuctx->sched_cb_sw_usage++)
list_add(&cpuctx->sched_cb_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list));
this_cpu_inc(perf_sched_cb_usages);
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 14:52 [RFC 0/2] perf/core: Invoke pmu::sched_task callback for cpu events Namhyung Kim
2020-11-02 14:52 ` [RFC 1/2] perf/core: Enable sched_task callbacks if PMU has it Namhyung Kim
2020-11-05 14:47 ` Liang, Kan
2020-11-05 15:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2020-11-05 19:01 ` Liang, Kan
2020-11-06 0:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2020-11-06 16:11 ` Liang, Kan
2020-11-02 14:52 ` [RFC 2/2] perf/core: Invoke pmu::sched_task callback for per-cpu events Namhyung Kim
2020-11-05 14:48 ` Liang, Kan
2020-11-05 15:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2020-11-05 19:39 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2020-11-05 21:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2020-11-05 23:12 ` Liang, Kan
2020-11-05 8:29 ` [RFC 0/2] perf/core: Invoke pmu::sched_task callback for cpu events Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd97ab7c-039c-b968-3008-8bcd51700c8c@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gmx@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox