Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: display/msm: Document MDSS on QCS8300

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 14/01/2025 11:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 04:03:10PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^display-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    additionalProperties: true
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - const: qcom,qcs8300-dpu
>>> +          - const: qcom,sa8775p-dpu
>>> +
>>> +  "^displayport-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    additionalProperties: true
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - const: qcom,qcs8300-dp
>>> +          - const: qcom,sm8650-dp
>>
>> Parts of qcs8300 display are compatible with sa8775p, other parts with
>> sm8650. That's odd or even not correct. Assuming it is actually correct,
>> it deserves explanation in commit msg.
> 
> It seems to be correct. These are two different IP blocks with
> different modifications. QCS8300's DP configuration matches the SM8650
> ([1]), though the DPU is the same as the one on the SA8775P platform.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/411626da-7563-48fb-ac7c-94f06e73e4b8@quicinc.com/

That's the driver, so you claim that qcs8300, which is a sa8775p, is not
compatible with sa8775p because of current driver code? You see the
contradiction? sa8775p is not compatible with sa8775p because of current
driver patch?

I don't think it is correct, but let's repeat: if you think otherwise,
this should be explain in commit msg.

Best regards,
Krzysztof