From: Tianxianting <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking whether req is null
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:49:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be133ab59334475dacd4a52a2834fe71@h3c.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921150824.GA4034182@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>
HI Keith,
Thanks for your comments,
I will submit a new patch of version 2 for the further reviewing, v2 patch will contains:
1, retain existing judgement and dev_warn;
2, add the check whether req is null(already did in this patch)
3, simplify and make the changelog succinct according to you said " This is what I'm thinking:".
Is it right?
Should I retain the nvme_irq crash log in changelog, mention the difference between nvmeq->q_depth and tagset queue_depth?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Busch [mailto:kbusch@kernel.org]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 11:08 PM
To: tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Cc: axboe@fb.com; hch@lst.de; sagi@grimberg.me; linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking whether req is null
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:10:52AM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> @@ -940,13 +940,6 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
> struct nvme_completion *cqe = &nvmeq->cqes[idx];
> struct request *req;
>
> - if (unlikely(cqe->command_id >= nvmeq->q_depth)) {
> - dev_warn(nvmeq->dev->ctrl.device,
> - "invalid id %d completed on queue %d\n",
> - cqe->command_id, le16_to_cpu(cqe->sq_id));
> - return;
> - }
> -
> /*
> * AEN requests are special as they don't time out and can
> * survive any kind of queue freeze and often don't respond to @@
> -960,6 +953,13 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
> }
>
> req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(nvme_queue_tagset(nvmeq), cqe->command_id);
> + if (unlikely(!req)) {
> + dev_warn(nvmeq->dev->ctrl.device,
> + "req is null for tag %d completed on queue %d\n",
> + cqe->command_id, le16_to_cpu(cqe->sq_id));
> + return;
> + }
This is making sense now, though I think we should retain the existing
dev_warn() since it's still accurate and provides continuity for people who are used to looking for these sorts of messages.
Your changelog is a bit much though. I think we can say it a bit more succinctly. This is what I'm thinking:
The driver registers interrupts for queues before initializing the
tagset because it uses the number of successful request_irq() calls
to configure the tagset parameters. This allows a race condition with
the current tag validity check if the controller happens to produce
an interrupt with a corrupted CQE before the tagset is initialized.
Replace the driver's indirect tag check with the one already provided
by the block layer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 2:10 [PATCH] nvme: replace meaningless judgement by checking whether req is null Xianting Tian
2020-09-21 6:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 15:08 ` Keith Busch
2020-09-21 15:49 ` Tianxianting [this message]
2020-09-21 15:59 ` Keith Busch
2020-09-21 16:08 ` Tianxianting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be133ab59334475dacd4a52a2834fe71@h3c.com \
--to=tian.xianting@h3c.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox