From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kasan: Add explicit preconditions to kasan_report()
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:58:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be55dae5-e654-7673-fea6-7ee4055d2be2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+yyJia6zOCMpy6ZJDX-Brvr_s88gZ6HwG2TxfLgtw=SSg@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/22/21 2:46 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:38 PM Vincenzo Frascino
> <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> With the introduction of KASAN_HW_TAGS, kasan_report() dereferences
>> the address passed as a parameter.
>
> It doesn't dereference the address, it accesses the metadata. And only
> when addr_has_metadata() succeeds.
>
Yes, this is correct. Seems I forgot again to unstash something. Will fix it in v4.
>>
>> Add a comment to make sure that the preconditions to the function are
>> explicitly clarified.
>>
>> Note: An invalid address (e.g. NULL) passed to the function when,
>> KASAN_HW_TAGS is enabled, leads to a kernel panic.
>
> This is no longer true, right? Commit description needs to be updated.
>
>>
>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
>> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/kasan.h | 7 +++++++
>> mm/kasan/kasan.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
>> index fe1ae73ff8b5..0aea9e2a2a01 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kasan.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
>> @@ -333,6 +333,13 @@ static inline void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr)
>> return (void *)arch_kasan_reset_tag(addr);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * kasan_report - print a report about a bad memory access detected by KASAN
>> + * @addr: address of the bad access
>> + * @size: size of the bad access
>> + * @is_write: whether the bad access is a write or a read
>> + * @ip: instruction pointer for the accessibility check or the bad access itself
>> + */
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
>> bool kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size,
>> bool is_write, unsigned long ip);
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.h b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
>> index cc4d9e1d49b1..8c706e7652f2 100644
>> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.h
>> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
>> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ bool check_memory_region(unsigned long addr, size_t size, bool write,
>>
>> static inline bool addr_has_metadata(const void *addr)
>> {
>> - return true;
>> + return (is_vmalloc_addr(addr) || virt_addr_valid(addr));
>> }
>
> Let's put this change into a separate patch.
>
Ok, it will be done in v4.
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC || CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 14:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] kasan: Fix metadata detection for KASAN_HW_TAGS Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: Improve kernel address detection of __is_lm_address() Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 14:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-22 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kasan: Add explicit preconditions to kasan_report() Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 14:46 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22 14:58 ` Vincenzo Frascino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be55dae5-e654-7673-fea6-7ee4055d2be2@arm.com \
--to=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox