Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/65] 6.1.78-rc2 review

Jon Hunter
2024-02-15T11:12:53Z

On 15/02/2024 11:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:04:11AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 14/02/2024 14:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.78 release.
>>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:28:54 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.78-rc2.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>>
>> No new regressions for Tegra ...
>>
>> Test results for stable-v6.7:
>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>> 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
>> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>>
>> Linux version: 6.7.5-rc2-gc94a8b48bd4b
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>
>> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> You sent 2 of these, one without a failure, and one with?

Sorry the above is for v6.7 and so responded to the wrong one. So v6.1
is all good.

> confused,

Yes I confused myself too.

Jon

--
nvpublic