From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263961AbTJFDLa (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:11:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263962AbTJFDLa (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:11:30 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:31237 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263961AbTJFDL3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:11:29 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: Who changed /proc// in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? Date: 6 Oct 2003 03:01:53 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: References: <20031001115248.GC23819@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <20031002010054.GA13639@compsoc.man.ac.uk> X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1065409313 13883 192.168.12.62 (6 Oct 2003 03:01:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20031002010054.GA13639@compsoc.man.ac.uk>, John Levon wrote: | On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:21:25PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote: | | > finger on it. In any case, I think the OP was noting that it was a | > fairly impactful (is that a word?) change not to get a line in the | > changelog. That's directed to whoever actually prepares the CL, not the | | It did get in the changelog (it's automated). It just didn't get sent | for public review at all. Actually, while there was an entry for the change, it didn't mention that there was a major interface rethink. In that particular case I believe a human should have been in the loop. Just a comment, not major issue. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.