Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7)

bill davidsen
2003-10-09T21:37:17Z

In article <m1y8vufe5l.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>,
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
| Cherry George Mathew <cherry@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
|
| > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| >
| > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct
| > > kexec syscall number (274).
| >
| > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've
| > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+ series kernels. Or is it the law
| > the Jungle ?
|
| So far the law of the jungle. Regardless of the rest it looks like it
| is time to submit a place keeping patch.

Forgive me if the politics of this have changed, but will a place
keeping patch be accepted for a feature which has not?
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.