From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
Date: 18 Dec 2003 16:29:23 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <brskl3$cng$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200312181149.25571.grahame@notofthisearth.freeserve.co.uk
In article <200312181149.25571.grahame@notofthisearth.freeserve.co.uk>,
Grahame White <grahame@notofthisearth.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
| On Thursday 18 December 2003 17:06, Balram Adlakha wrote:
| > John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com) wrote:
| > > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
| > > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
| > > altogether during 2.7.
| > >
| > > John.
| >
| > Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
| > is newer?
|
| Well let's see there could be :
|
| 2.beaver.rolling
| 2.beaver.sparking
| 2.beaver.toking
| 2.beaver.passing
| 2.beaver.stoned
| 2.beaver.tripping
I take back what I just said about letting someone else name the
subversions ;-)
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-18 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-18 17:06 Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Balram Adlakha
2003-12-18 11:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-18 11:49 ` Grahame White
2003-12-18 16:29 ` bill davidsen [this message]
2003-12-18 16:38 ` Chris Meadors
2003-12-18 17:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-18 18:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-18 19:02 ` John Dee
2003-12-18 19:16 ` [SILLY] Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0' Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 19:21 ` Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Andrew Walrond
2003-12-18 19:37 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-18 20:22 ` Andrew Walrond
2003-12-19 1:34 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-18 6:33 Can't wait for 2.8 or 3.0 Dan Brow
2003-12-18 6:30 ` Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Monchi Abbad
2003-12-18 7:34 ` Dan Brow
2003-12-18 10:58 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-18 11:14 ` John Bradford
2003-12-18 12:46 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 16:26 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 21:03 ` Rob Landley
2003-12-19 0:32 ` Dan Brow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='brskl3$cng$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com' \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox