From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?)
Date: 7 Jan 2004 23:35:56 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bti54s$7sn$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031230094157.A7191@animx.eu.org
In article <20031230094157.A7191@animx.eu.org>,
Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org> wrote:
| > > > nice about bad sectors as most hardware raid controllers. On the other
| > > > hand the md driver kicks the ass of nearly every raid controller I've tried.
| > >
| > > Faster than the mylex extreme raid 2000? or one of the higher end adaptecs?
| >
| > Even faster than HP/Compaq cciss hwraid setups, yes.
|
| I've personally not had any experience with any hardware raid other than the
| mylex DAC960 family.
|
| One thing that keeps me from using the linux raid sw is the fact it can't be
| partitioned. I thought about lvm/evms, but I'm unwilling to make an initrd to
| set it up (mounting root). Unfortunately boot loaders don't seem to support
| anything other than raid1. (Mostly lilo, but I'm not sure grub would do this
| either)
What? You do the RAID on partitions, so you can do anything you want.
They don't aven have to be the same type RAID, I once ran fours drives
with a small 0+1 partiton (2+2) for reliability and read performance,
and a large partition of the rest of the drives RAID-5. Different stripe
size, because one array had many small reads and the other many large
reads.
You can do anything you have the guts to do, except change partition
size once you are setup.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-28 18:04 Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 18:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-12-28 21:35 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 21:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-28 22:14 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 23:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-29 1:18 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-28 21:56 ` bert hubert
2003-12-28 23:36 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-01-07 23:28 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29 2:10 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 13:41 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-29 18:59 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-29 19:04 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 19:06 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 0:03 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 6:54 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 14:41 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 20:58 ` Samuel Flory
2004-01-07 23:35 ` bill davidsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='bti54s$7sn$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com' \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox