The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Qais Yousef" <qyousef@layalina.io>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Swapnil Sapkal" <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	luca.abeni@santannapisa.it, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:05:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c02dd563-7cfc-404d-80d1-cec934117caf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304084045.62554-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com>

On 3/4/25 3:40 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> do.
>
> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
>   kernel/sched/topology.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>   5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
>   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
>   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>   #endif
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
>   

If all access to sched_domains_mutex is through the wrappers, we may not 
need to expose sched_domains_mutex at all. Also it is more efficient for 
the non-SMP case to put the wrappers inside the CONFIG_SMP block and 
define the empty inline functions in the else part.


>   struct sched_param {
>   	int sched_priority;
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 0f910c828973..f87526edb2a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -994,10 +994,10 @@ static void
>   partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   				    struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
>   {
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
>   	dl_rebuild_rd_accounting();
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9aecd914ac69..7b14500d731b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8424,9 +8424,9 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
>   	 * CPU masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot
>   	 * happen.
>   	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	sched_init_domains(cpu_active_mask);
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   
>   	/* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
>   	if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)) < 0)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index ef047add7f9e..a0893a483d35 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>   	bool orig;
>   
>   	cpus_read_lock();
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   
>   	orig = sched_debug_verbose;
>   	result = debugfs_write_file_bool(filp, ubuf, cnt, ppos);
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>   		sd_dentry = NULL;
>   	}
>   
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   	cpus_read_unlock();
>   
>   	return result;
> @@ -515,9 +515,9 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
>   	debugfs_create_u32("migration_cost_ns", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_migration_cost);
>   	debugfs_create_u32("nr_migrate", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_nr_migrate);
>   
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	update_sched_domain_debugfs();
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   #endif
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index c49aea8c1025..e2b879ec9458 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,19 @@
>   #include <linux/bsearch.h>
>   
>   DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_domains_mutex);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +}
> +void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +}
> +#else
> +void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void) { }
> +void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void) { }
> +#endif
>   
>   /* Protected by sched_domains_mutex: */
>   static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask;
> @@ -2791,7 +2804,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains_locked(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   			     struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
>   {
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   }

There are two "lockdep_assert_held(&sched_domains_mutex);" statements in 
topology.c file and one in cpuset.c. That can be problematic in the 
non-SMP case. Maybe another wrapper to do the assert?

Cheers,
Longman



  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04  8:40 [PATCH 0/5] Fix SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting during suspend Juri Lelli
2025-03-04  8:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/deadline: Ignore special tasks when rebuilding domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-04  8:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex Juri Lelli
2025-03-04 15:05   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-03-04 15:57     ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-04 16:01     ` Waiman Long
2025-03-05 10:52       ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-07  9:32         ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-07 14:49           ` Waiman Long
2025-03-04  8:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/deadline: Generalize unique visiting of root domains Juri Lelli
2025-03-04  8:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/deadline: Rebuild root domain accounting after every update Juri Lelli
2025-03-04 15:17   ` Waiman Long
2025-03-04 15:33     ` Waiman Long
2025-03-05 11:43       ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-05 11:20     ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-04  8:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/topology: Remove redundant dl_clear_root_domain call Juri Lelli
2025-03-04 15:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting during suspend Jon Hunter
2025-03-04 15:53   ` Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c02dd563-7cfc-404d-80d1-cec934117caf@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox