Re: [PATCH 1/1] hexagon: Don't select GENERIC_IOMAP without HAS_IOPORT support

Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-02T09:34:59Z

On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, at 08:04, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 16:35 +0000, Brian Cain wrote:
>> >
>> > With 2 more of my HAS_IOPORT patches having gone into v6.12-rc1 I just
>> > noticed that this one seems to have fallen into the cracks. This is
>> > probably my fault for not properly confirming that I'd be happy for you
>> > to take it. Do you want me to resend a new version rebased on v6.12-
>> > rc1?
>>
>> Oh, sorry! Yes, if you could resend a rebased one I'll make sure I am able to land it.
>>
>> -Brian
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I just tried with
>
> b4 shazam '<20240403132447.719833-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>'
>
> and this patch actually still applies cleanly and matches the result I
> got rebasing the whole series[0]. So on second thought taking it from
> here directly might still be the easiest. That said I'll have to send
> out the other 4 outstanding patches required for the final inb()
> compile time switch, so if you prefer I can still resend too.

Hi Niklas,

For simplicity I would suggest you keep all the remaining patches
as a series now and I'll take them through the asm-generic
tree in order to get them in more easily along with the final patch.

Arnd