From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"jing2.liu@linux.intel.com" <jing2.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"Zeng, Guang" <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 18/23] kvm: x86: Get/set expanded xstate buffer
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:06:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c06fdc4f3b4d4346ae80801a6c3a6ff2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <219a751e-ac2d-9ce1-9db7-7d5b1edd6bdd@redhat.com>
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 4:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/21/21 03:45, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> >> KVM_GET_XSAVE2 and KVM_SET_XSAVE respectively write and read as
> many
> >> bytes as are returned by KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2),
> when
> >> invoked on the vm file descriptor. Currently,
> >> KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2) will only return a value that is
> >> greater than 4096 bytes if any dynamic features have been enabled
> >> with ``arch_prctl()``; this however may change in the future.
> > Would this make people think that
> KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2)
> > doesn’t return the value (i.e. return 0) if it is smaller than 4096?
> > (i.e. KVM_GET_XSAVE2 doesn't work with size < 4096, which isn’t true)
> >
> > I plan to just reword a bit:
> > Currently, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2) will only return a
> size
> > value, and the value is greater than 4096 bytes if any dynamic
> > features have been enabled with ``arch_prctl()``. More types of values could
> be returned in the future.
>
> Next refinement:
>
> The size value returned by KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2) will
> always be at least 4096. Currently, it is only greater than 4096 if a dynamic
> feature has been enabled with ``arch_prctl()``, but this may change in the
> future.
> (I'm not sure if the first sentence is true in the code, but if not it is a bug that
> has to be fixed :)).
For the implementation, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION(KVM_CAP_XSAVE2) always return kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size.
Do you want to change it to below?
If (kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size < 4096)
return 0;
else
return kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size;
If the size is less than 4096 (e.g. no dynamic xfeatures enabled),
userspace should use the old KVM_GET_XSAVE (instead of KVM_GET_XSAVE2)?
(KVM_GET_XSAVE2 supports to work with size less than 4096, so I think this isn't necessary)
Thanks,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-21 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 15:29 [PATCH v2 00/23] AMX Support in KVM Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] x86/fpu: Extend fpu_xstate_prctl() with guest permissions Jing Liu
2021-12-17 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-17 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] x86/fpu: Prepare guest FPU for dynamically enabled FPU features Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] kvm: x86: Fix xstate_required_size() to follow XSTATE alignment rule Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] kvm: x86: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures at KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID Jing Liu
2021-12-20 13:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] kvm: x86: Check permitted dynamic xfeatures at KVM_SET_CPUID2 Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] x86/fpu: Make XFD initialization in __fpstate_reset() a function argument Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] x86/fpu: Add guest support to xfd_enable_feature() Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_update_guest_perm_features() for guest Jing Liu
2021-12-17 18:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] kvm: x86: Enable dynamic XSAVE features at KVM_SET_CPUID2 Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_update_guest_xfd() for IA32_XFD emulation Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] kvm: x86: Add emulation for IA32_XFD Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] x86/fpu: Prepare xfd_err in struct fpu_guest Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] kvm: x86: Intercept #NM for saving IA32_XFD_ERR Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] kvm: x86: Emulate IA32_XFD_ERR for guest Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] kvm: x86: Add XCR0 support for Intel AMX Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] kvm: x86: Add CPUID " Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] x86/fpu: add uabi_size to guest_fpu Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] kvm: x86: Get/set expanded xstate buffer Jing Liu
2021-12-20 9:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-21 2:45 ` Wang, Wei W
2021-12-21 8:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-21 9:06 ` Wang, Wei W [this message]
2021-12-21 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] kvm: selftests: Add support for KVM_CAP_XSAVE2 Jing Liu
2021-12-20 13:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] docs: kvm: Add KVM_GET_XSAVE2 Jing Liu
2021-12-20 9:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_sync_guest_vmexit_xfd_state() Jing Liu
2021-12-17 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] kvm: x86: Disable interception for IA32_XFD on demand Jing Liu
2021-12-20 9:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-21 6:42 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-12-21 8:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] kvm: x86: Disable RDMSR interception of IA32_XFD_ERR Jing Liu
2021-12-20 9:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-21 6:29 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-12-21 8:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-21 9:00 ` Liu, Jing2
2021-12-21 9:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-17 18:52 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] AMX Support in KVM Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c06fdc4f3b4d4346ae80801a6c3a6ff2@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox