Re: [BUG] get_unmapped_area() change -> non booting machine

[hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)]

Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402120833000.5816@home.osdl.org>
By author:    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> I really think that we should aim for "brk()" just working. It's often
> faster than mmap, and it's one of those very basic things (ie we should
> _not_ assume we have glibc and malloc(), and others may well want to use
> brk() too).
> 

Okay... I'll ask... what is the point with brk(), i.e. what makes it
faster?  If we didn't have brk(), we could get rid of UNMAPPED_BASE
and therefore get rid of the artificial splitting of userspace memory
(modulo prelink, but that's optional.)

brk() at least on the surface really looks like a strange legacy
interface.  Obviously it's important on nommu architectures, but on
mmu architectures it seems rather redundant.

	-hpa
-- 
PGP public key available - finger hpa@zytor.com
Key fingerprint: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD  1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Bahá'u'lláh
Just Say No to Morden * The Shadows were defeated -- Babylon 5 is renewed!!