From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267066AbUBMPlj (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:41:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267072AbUBMPli (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:41:38 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:10122 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267066AbUBMPlL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:41:11 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Subject: Re: why are capabilities disabled? Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd953c90e.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de, en Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If capabilities aren't still too unmature, wouldn't it be fine to have > an option in "make menuconfig" to enable them? Is Security Options -> Enable security models -> Default Capabilities what i'm searching for?