From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: xulang <xulang@uniontech.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, dzm91@hust.edu.cn, eddyz87@gmail.com,
haoluo@google.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn,
kernel@uniontech.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.chaignon@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:39:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c12eccb7-d0ba-48a2-ba11-59d25958de92@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FA0A9158227E9982+20260330063228.183119-1-xulang@uniontech.com>
On 3/29/26 11:32 PM, xulang wrote:
>>From looking at git history on pcpu_init_value, the issue should be
>> introduced in commit d3bec0138bfb.
> I've tried for several days, to adjust 'offset' to match the 'data_end', but couldn't
> reproduce this OOB since there seems to be always a 'tail room' after the 'data_end'.
> I've checked how the buffer of a 'skb' is alloced, take driver 'e1000' for example,
> it has many complicated round-up operations, in my test, when I send a UDP package
> with payload size less than 210, the alloced buffer size of a skb seems to be always
> 448, I've also checked the validity of its KASAN shadow memory, it also says 448. when
> I go on increasing the payload size(over 210), for example, 211, the buffer size grows
> sharply, I haven't found out when the 'data_end' reaches the 'tail end' yet, different
> NIC driver may behave differently on the 'tail room'?
It is hard to audit all possible sources.
> In my opinion, 'pcpu_init_value' shouldn't read 8 bytes if it has
> no guarantee that the 'src' is rounded up to 8-bytes.
so make sense not to read more than what the verifier has verified.
Before commit d3bec0138bfb, it didn't round up.
The current pcpu_copy_value() also uses copy_map_value() instead of
copy_map_value_long().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 5:25 [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-12 11:51 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 16:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 18:02 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 19:58 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 16:46 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-13 20:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 13:51 ` xulang
2026-03-16 20:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 21:22 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Fix and test cgroup storage OOB issue xulang
[not found] ` <20260317100227.2157104-1-xulang@uniontech.com>
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-25 1:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-30 6:32 ` xulang
2026-03-31 4:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for cgroup storage OOB read xulang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c12eccb7-d0ba-48a2-ba11-59d25958de92@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=kernel@uniontech.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xulang@uniontech.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox