From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>,
skhawaja@google.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] iommufd: Allow binding to a noiommu device
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 14:51:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c15c4d4d-89a8-4ad9-86e2-e1adb3ff8b54@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513150800.000027e5@linux.microsoft.com>
On 5/14/26 06:08, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void iommufd_group_release(struct kref *kref)
>>> {
>>> struct iommufd_group *igroup =
>>> @@ -30,9 +40,11 @@ static void iommufd_group_release(struct kref
>>> *kref)
>>> WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&igroup->pasid_attach));
>>>
>>> - xa_cmpxchg(&igroup->ictx->groups,
>>> iommu_group_id(igroup->group), igroup,
>>> - NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - iommu_group_put(igroup->group);
>>> + if (igroup->group) {
>>> + xa_cmpxchg(&igroup->ictx->groups,
>>> iommu_group_id(igroup->group),
>>> + igroup, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + iommu_group_put(igroup->group);
>>> + }
>>> mutex_destroy(&igroup->lock);
>>> kfree(igroup);
>>> }
>>> @@ -204,32 +216,19 @@ void iommufd_device_destroy(struct
>>> iommufd_object *obj) struct iommufd_device *idev =
>>> container_of(obj, struct iommufd_device, obj);
>>>
>>> - iommu_device_release_dma_owner(idev->dev);
>>> + if (!idev->igroup)
>>> + return;
>> I don't quite follow this logic. Is this check being added
>> specifically for the new noiommu mode? Since the noiommu mode
>> introduces the convention that "igroup->group == NULL" implies
>> noiommu, there should be no cases where idev->igroup itself is NULL.
>>
> idev->igroup can be null on error path only, not limited to noiommu. It
> is the partially initialized idev case.
> /*
> * iommufd_device_destroy() handles partially initialized idev,
> * so iommufd_object_abort_and_destroy() is safe to call here.
> */
>
> How about add this comment?
> /* igroup is NULL when destroy called during bind error cleanup */
If it's not limited to noiommu, why not making it in a separated patch?
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 18:41 [PATCH v5 0/9] iommufd: Enable noiommu mode for cdev Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] vfio: Rename VFIO_NOIOMMU to VFIO_GROUP_NOIOMMU Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] iommufd: Support a HWPT without an iommu driver for noiommu Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 6:58 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-13 21:30 ` Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 19:18 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] iommufd: Move igroup allocation to a function Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 7:18 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iommufd: Allow binding to a noiommu device Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 7:37 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-13 22:08 ` Jacob Pan
2026-05-14 6:51 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] iommufd: Add an ioctl to query PA from IOVA for noiommu mode Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:58 ` Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 7:53 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-13 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-13 22:20 ` Jacob Pan
2026-05-13 23:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] vfio/group: Add VFIO_CDEV_NOIOMMU Kconfig and tolerate NULL group Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] vfio: Enable cdev noiommu mode under iommufd Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] selftests/vfio: Add iommufd noiommu mode selftest for cdev Jacob Pan
2026-05-11 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: Update VFIO NOIOMMU mode Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c15c4d4d-89a8-4ad9-86e2-e1adb3ff8b54@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=ssengar@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox