public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add runtime PM operations
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 18:36:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1830d80-c8b2-19ec-fbfd-6bc3d2c806ce@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728122052.296488-1-limings@nvidia.com>

On 28/07/23 15:20, Liming Sun wrote:
> This commit implements the runtime PM operations to disable eMMC
> card clock when idle.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liming Sun <limings@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v4->v5:
>     - Address Adrian's comment to move the pm_enable to the end to
>       avoid race;
> v3->v4:
>     - Fix compiling reported by 'kernel test robot';
> v2->v3:
>     - Revise the commit message;
> v1->v2:
>     Updates for comments from Ulf:
>     - Make the runtime PM logic generic for sdhci-of-dwcmshc;
> v1: Initial version.
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> index e68cd87998c8..5cee42d72257 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  
> @@ -559,6 +560,8 @@ static int dwcmshc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err_setup_host;
>  
> +	devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);

By default, runtime PM regards the device as not active, so
typically drivers will use something like pm_runtime_set_active()
prior to pm_runtime_enable(dev)

In fact it is better to enable before adding the host but
increment the usage count to prevent runtime suspend.  That
means adding some get/puts, ending up with something like:

+	pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
+	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+	pm_runtime_enable(dev);

	err = sdhci_setup_host(host);
	if (err)
-		goto err_clk;
+		goto err_rpm;

	if (rk_priv)
		dwcmshc_rk35xx_postinit(host, priv);

	err = __sdhci_add_host(host);
	if (err)
		goto err_setup_host;

+	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);

	return 0;

err_setup_host:
	sdhci_cleanup_host(host);
+ err_rpm:
+	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+	pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
err_clk:
	clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->bus_clk);
	if (rk_priv)
		clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(RK35xx_MAX_CLKS,
					   rk_priv->rockchip_clks);
free_pltfm:
	sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
	return err;

> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_setup_host:
> @@ -646,7 +649,56 @@ static int dwcmshc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(dwcmshc_pmops, dwcmshc_suspend, dwcmshc_resume);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +
> +static void dwcmshc_enable_card_clk(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	u16 ctrl;
> +
> +	ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);

You could save an mmio write:

	if (ctrl & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN && !(ctrl & SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN)) {

> +	ctrl |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> +	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);

	}

> +}
> +
> +static void dwcmshc_disable_card_clk(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	u16 ctrl;
> +
> +	ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);

You could save an mmio write:

	if (ctrl & SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN) {

> +	ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> +	sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);

	}

> +}
> +
> +static int dwcmshc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret = 0;

ret doesn't need initialization

> +
> +	ret = sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(host);

If you *only* want to disable the card clock, then
it is probably not necessary to call sdhci_runtime_suspend_host()
and sdhci_runtime_resume_host().

> +	if (!ret)
> +		dwcmshc_disable_card_clk(host);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dwcmshc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret = 0;

ret isn't needed

> +
> +	dwcmshc_enable_card_clk(host);
> +	ret = sdhci_runtime_resume_host(host, 0);

just
	return sdhci_runtime_resume_host(host, 0);

> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops dwcmshc_pmops = {
> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dwcmshc_suspend, dwcmshc_resume)

Typically you need a way to coordinate runtime PM and system PM, refer:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/runtime_pm.html#runtime-pm-and-system-sleep

> +	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dwcmshc_runtime_suspend,
> +			   dwcmshc_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
>  
>  static struct platform_driver sdhci_dwcmshc_driver = {
>  	.driver	= {


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-01 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11 19:03 [PATCH v1 1/1] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add runtime PM operations for BlueField-3 Liming Sun
2023-05-12  7:35 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-05-12 12:09   ` Liming Sun
2023-05-12 12:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Liming Sun
2023-05-12 12:26 ` [PATCH v3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add runtime PM operations Liming Sun
2023-05-12 17:43   ` kernel test robot
2023-05-12 18:15 ` [PATCH v4] " Liming Sun
2023-05-19 13:19   ` Adrian Hunter
2023-07-28 12:20     ` Liming Sun
2023-07-28 12:20 ` [PATCH v5] " Liming Sun
2023-08-01 15:36   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2023-08-04 23:29     ` Liming Sun
2023-08-04 23:30 ` [PATCH v6] " Liming Sun
2023-08-08  9:39   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-08 13:21     ` Liming Sun
2023-08-08 13:56       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-08 20:24         ` Liming Sun
2023-08-09 10:58   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v7] " Liming Sun
2023-08-10  8:12   ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-10 10:21     ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-10 12:44       ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-10 16:34         ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-11  5:56           ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-11  8:36             ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-16 16:28               ` Liming Sun
2023-08-16 21:40                 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-17  1:06 ` [PATCH v8] " Liming Sun
2023-08-17  7:35   ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-17 16:22     ` Liming Sun
2023-08-18  7:27       ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-17 16:21 ` [PATCH v9] " Liming Sun
2023-08-18  9:00   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-18  9:35     ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-18 10:19       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-22 19:46         ` Liming Sun
2023-08-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] mmc : sdhci-of-dwcmshc : add error handling in dwcmshc_resume Liming Sun
2023-08-24  7:25   ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-24 11:00   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-08-22 19:59 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] This commit implements the runtime PM operations to disable eMMC card clock when idle Liming Sun
2023-08-24  7:28   ` Adrian Hunter
2023-08-24 11:00   ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1830d80-c8b2-19ec-fbfd-6bc3d2c806ce@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=davthompson@nvidia.com \
    --cc=limings@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox