From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, hch@lst.de, nilay@linux.ibm.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] dm-stripe: limit chunk_sectors to the stripe size
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 10:15:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c216f57a-3d9f-4549-9ed2-4dbc2b2330d9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7e147a8-f22e-e420-1497-5b31be9ab4e3@redhat.com>
On 09/06/2025 16:19, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> index 24a857ff6d0b..4f1f7173740c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ static int dm_set_device_limits(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> + /* For striped types, limit the chunk_sectors to the chunk size */
>> + if (dm_target_supports_striped(ti->type))
>> + limits->chunk_sectors = len >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> +
> len is already in sectors, so why do we shift it right?
Actually what I am passing is not the proper value at all. len holds the
sc->stripe_width, and that seems to be md dev size / # stripes. I think
that we want chunk_size, right?
>
> Could this logic be moved to the function stripe_io_hints, so that we
> don't have to add a new flag for that and that we don't have to modify the
> generic dm code?
>
That would be better. I am going to have to change
blk_stack_atomic_writes_limits() to work for that, but I think that code
needs to change anyway if the bottom device has its own chunk_sectors
(as Nilay mentioned about 4/4).
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 15:08 [PATCH RFC 0/4] block: set chunk_sectors from stacked dev stripe size John Garry
2025-06-05 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] md/raid0: set chunk_sectors limit John Garry
2025-06-05 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] md/raid10: " John Garry
2025-06-05 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] dm-stripe: limit chunk_sectors to the stripe size John Garry
2025-06-06 15:16 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-12 10:01 ` John Garry
2025-06-09 15:19 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-06-12 9:15 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-06-05 15:08 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] block: use chunk_sectors when evaluating stacked atomic write limits John Garry
2025-06-06 15:23 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-12 9:17 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c216f57a-3d9f-4549-9ed2-4dbc2b2330d9@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).