* Question on Scheduler activations
@ 2005-03-18 14:08 Imanpreet Arora
2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I came across
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html
It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler
activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of
Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler
activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide
BOTH the short and long answer to
a) If they were ever implemented?
b) Reasons for rejection?
TIA
--
Imanpreet Singh Arora
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations
2005-03-18 14:08 Question on Scheduler activations Imanpreet Arora
@ 2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey
2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hong Kong Phoey @ 2005-03-18 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imanpreet Arora; +Cc: linux-kernel
RTFM
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:38:45 +0530, Imanpreet Arora <imanpreet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I came across
>
> http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html
>
> It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler
> activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of
> Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler
> activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide
> BOTH the short and long answer to
>
> a) If they were ever implemented?
> b) Reasons for rejection?
>
> TIA
>
> --
>
> Imanpreet Singh Arora
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations
2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey
@ 2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora
2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hong Kong Phoey; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey
<hongkongphoey@gmail.com> wrote:
> RTFM
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey
<hongkongphoey@gmail.com> wrote:
> RTFM
I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M. That is if you have any.
--
Imanpreet Singh Arora
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations
2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora
@ 2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Diego Calleja @ 2005-03-18 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imanpreet Arora; +Cc: hongkongphoey, linux-kernel
El Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:46:42 +0530,
Imanpreet Arora <imanpreet@gmail.com> escribió:
> I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M. That is if you have any.
What "Update: this document is obsolete" means is that the document is obsolete.
Probably it should include a link to http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-18 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-18 14:08 Question on Scheduler activations Imanpreet Arora
2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey
2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora
2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox