* Question on Scheduler activations @ 2005-03-18 14:08 Imanpreet Arora 2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hello, I came across http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide BOTH the short and long answer to a) If they were ever implemented? b) Reasons for rejection? TIA -- Imanpreet Singh Arora ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations 2005-03-18 14:08 Question on Scheduler activations Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey 2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Hong Kong Phoey @ 2005-03-18 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Imanpreet Arora; +Cc: linux-kernel RTFM On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:38:45 +0530, Imanpreet Arora <imanpreet@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I came across > > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html > > It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler > activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of > Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler > activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide > BOTH the short and long answer to > > a) If they were ever implemented? > b) Reasons for rejection? > > TIA > > -- > > Imanpreet Singh Arora > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations 2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey @ 2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora 2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hong Kong Phoey; +Cc: linux-kernel On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey <hongkongphoey@gmail.com> wrote: > RTFM On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey <hongkongphoey@gmail.com> wrote: > RTFM I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M. That is if you have any. -- Imanpreet Singh Arora ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on Scheduler activations 2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora @ 2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Diego Calleja @ 2005-03-18 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Imanpreet Arora; +Cc: hongkongphoey, linux-kernel El Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:46:42 +0530, Imanpreet Arora <imanpreet@gmail.com> escribió: > I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M. That is if you have any. What "Update: this document is obsolete" means is that the document is obsolete. Probably it should include a link to http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-18 16:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-03-18 14:08 Question on Scheduler activations Imanpreet Arora 2005-03-18 15:06 ` Hong Kong Phoey 2005-03-18 15:16 ` Imanpreet Arora 2005-03-18 16:00 ` Diego Calleja
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox