From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /dev/root: which approach ? [PATCH]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:18:52 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2nt7c$r32$1@news.cistron.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040310120145.248ae62d.akpm@osdl.org
In article <20040310120145.248ae62d.akpm@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Currently if you boot from a blockdevice with a dynamically
>> allocated major number (such as LVM or partitionable raid),
>> there is no way to check the root filesystem. The root
>> fs is still read-only, so you cannot create a device node
>> anywhere to point fsck at.
>>
>> This was discussed on the linux-raid mailinglist, and I proposed
>> (as proof of concept) a simple check in bdget() to see if the
>> device is being opened is the /dev/root node and if so redirect
>> it to the current root device. This is a 8-line patch, the only
>> disadvantage I can think of is that for an open file, inode->i_rdev
>> is then different from blockdevice->bd_dev.
>
>The /dev/root alias resolution looks nice to me, which probably means that
>it has a fatal flaw.
>
>Is it not possible to create a device node on ramfs or ramdisk and point
>fsck at that?
Yes, I thought of that too. But that wouldn't be trivial for
existing installations, unless you're the maintainer of the
distributions init package. Oh wait .. ;)
Anyway, it seemed to me to be very useful, and since /proc/mounts
already refers to /dev/root it seemed to fit in naturally hence
the proposed patches. If the definitive answer is "do it in
userspace" then that's OK too.
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-10 16:20 /dev/root: which approach ? [PATCH] Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-10 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-10 20:18 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg [this message]
2004-03-10 20:17 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-03-10 20:52 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-03-12 8:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-10 21:01 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='c2nt7c$r32$1@news.cistron.nl' \
--to=miquels@cistron.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox