From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Embed direct bits into gpa for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:12:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3cfd230eab895b186ce2bcbf404dc86f9874e15.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEtsPEnQTRBoJYtw@google.com>
On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 17:09 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> A few reasons.
>
> a. The error_code is used in other paths, e.g. see the PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS
> usage in emulator_write_std(), and the @access parameter from FNAME(gva_to_gpa)
> to FNAME(walk_addr_generic) (which is why FNAME(walk_addr) takes a sanitized
> "access", a.k.a. error code, instead of e.g. kvm_page_fault.
It makes sense to not have to re-constitute it.
> b. Keeping the entire error code allowed adding kvm_page_fault without having
> to churn *everything*.
> c. Preserving the entire error code simplifies the handoff to async #PF.
> d. Unpacking error_code into bools makes downstream code much cleaner, e.g.
> page_fault_can_be_fast() is a good example.
> e. Waiting until kvm_mmu_do_page_fault() to fill kvm_page_fault deduplicates a
> _lot_ of boilerplate, and allows for many fields to be "const".
> f. I really, really want to make (most of) kvm_page_fault a structure that's
> common to all architectures, at which point tracking e.g. exec, read, write,
> etc. using bool is pretty much the only sane option.
Aha on (f)!
It still seems a bit unfortunate to me, but thanks for sharing the practical
reasons. You kind of have to know to try to read the bools over error code (like
Yan pointed out in this case) to keep it from looking like reading it one way or
the other means something.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 0:10 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Embed direct bits into gpa for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 18:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 18:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-06-11 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 20:25 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 21:16 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-12 7:19 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 18:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-13 1:14 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 6:58 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-11 20:45 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 21:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-12 12:20 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 18:40 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-13 0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-13 16:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2025-06-12 4:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3cfd230eab895b186ce2bcbf404dc86f9874e15.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).