Re: [PATCH] net: ravb: Fix wrong dma_unmap_single() calls in ring unmapping

[Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>]

On 1/13/24 7:47 AM, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:

> When unmapping ring entries on Rx ring release, ravb driver needs to
> unmap only those entries that have been mapped successfully.
> 
> To check if an entry needs to be unmapped, currently the address stored
> inside descriptor is passed to dma_mapping_error() call. But, address
> field inside descriptor is 32-bit, while dma_mapping_error() is
> implemented by comparing it's argument with DMA_MAPPING_ERROR constant
> that is 64-bit when dma_addr_t is 64-bit. So the comparison gets wrong,
> resulting into ravb driver calling dma_unnmap_single() for 0xffffffff

   It's dma_unmap_single(). :-)

> address.
> 
> When the ring entries are mapped, in case of mapping failure the driver
> sets descriptor's size field to zero (which is a signal to hardware to
> not use this descriptor). Fix ring unmapping to detect if an entry needs
> to be unmapped by checking for zero size field.
> 
> Fixes: a47b70ea86bd ("ravb: unmap descriptors when freeing rings")
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 0e3731f50fc2..4d4b5d44c4e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_free_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
>  		struct ravb_rx_desc *desc = &priv->gbeth_rx_ring[i];
>  
> -		if (!dma_mapping_error(ndev->dev.parent,
> -				       le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
> +		if (le16_to_cpu(desc->ds_cc) != 0)

   It's not that != 0 or le16_to_cpu() are necessary here but we're on
the little-endian platforms anyways...

[...]
> @@ -281,8 +280,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_free_rcar(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
>  		struct ravb_ex_rx_desc *desc = &priv->rx_ring[q][i];
>  
> -		if (!dma_mapping_error(ndev->dev.parent,
> -				       le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
> +		if (le16_to_cpu(desc->ds_cc) != 0)
>  			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
>  					 le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
>  					 RX_BUF_SZ,

MBR, Sergey