public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: Add 'struct device *' field to the drm_bridge structure
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 00:53:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c44480ab-8d6b-4334-8eba-83db9b30ff1a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240514-scarlet-corgi-of-efficiency-faf2bb@penduick>

Hi,

On 2024/5/15 00:22, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:40:43PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> Because a lot of implementations has already added it into their drived
>> class, promote it into drm_bridge core may benifits a lot. drm bridge is
>> a driver, it should know the underlying hardware entity.
> Is there some actual benefits, or is it theoretical at this point?


I think, DRM bridge drivers could remove the 'struct device *dev'
member from their derived structure. Rely on the drm bridge core
when they need the 'struct device *' pointer.

> Maxime

-- 
Best regards,
Sui


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-14 15:40 [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: Add 'struct device *' field to the drm_bridge structure Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-14 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: Support finding bridge with struct device Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-15  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-15 10:17     ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-15 10:28       ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-15 10:34         ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-15 11:33           ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-14 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/bridge: Switch to use drm_bridge_add_with_dev() Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-14 16:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: Add 'struct device *' field to the drm_bridge structure Maxime Ripard
2024-05-14 16:53   ` Sui Jingfeng [this message]
2024-05-15 14:30     ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-15 14:53       ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-15 14:58         ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-15 15:19           ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-16  8:25             ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-16 10:40               ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-16 12:04                 ` Sui Jingfeng
2024-05-19 21:44                   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-21  8:37                   ` Maxime Ripard
2024-05-21  8:34                 ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c44480ab-8d6b-4334-8eba-83db9b30ff1a@linux.dev \
    --to=sui.jingfeng@linux.dev \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox