From: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jkosina@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST] Run IST traps from user mode preemptive on process stack
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:03:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110803110503v3f25d852nf52ebdc709d73706@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311012432.GA28576@basil.nowhere.org>
2008/3/11, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>:
> Run IST traps from user mode preemptive on process stack
>
> [Repost. Please ack or nack. -Andi]
>
> x86-64 has a few exceptions which run on special architecture
> supported IST exception stacks: these are nmi, double fault, stack fault,
> int 3, debug.
>
> Previously they would check for a scheduling event on returning
> if the original CPU state was user mode and then switch to a
> process stack to schedule.
>
> But the actual trap handler would still run on the IST stack
> with preemption disabled.
>
Hi Andi
In my post where I've been showing BUG trace:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/10/157
I've mentioned my problem with busy looping in Qemu.
I'm not sure whether this is good or bad sign - but with this patch
you have posted,
I do not have to wait in qemu for minutes to get the 'busy-loop' - I
get the exact same loop almost instantly when I start disk read of LV
partition and running my simple module insertion testcase.
> This patch changes these traps instead to always switch
> to the process stack when the trap originated from user mode.
> For kernel traps it keeps running non preemptive on the IST stack
> because that is much safer (e.g. to still get nmi watchdog events
> out even when the process stack is corrupted)
>
So what should I check to get fixed my problem in qemu ?
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-11 1:24 [PATCH REPOST] Run IST traps from user mode preemptive on process stack Andi Kleen
2008-03-11 12:03 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2008-03-11 13:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-11 13:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e36d110803110503v3f25d852nf52ebdc709d73706@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox