From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, zide.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/12] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:19:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5d21a4c-bfb1-4a0f-8302-d3b78fcc8f3e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03cfdc36-a7b9-4098-bc21-cb612907add2@linux.intel.com>
On 6/13/25 07:54, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> One other thing...
>>
>> XSAVES uses the modified optimization. That means if you did something
>> like this:
>>
>> NMI=>
>> xsaves_nmi();
>> <=IRET
>> ... run a little bit in the kernel
>> NMI=> // another NMI
>> xsaves_nmi();
>> <=IRET
>>
>> The second XSAVES might not actually write anything to the buffer
>> because the registers didn't change (they weren't modified). Is that OK?
> Yes. The per-cpu buffer in perf is only used by this XSAVES. No one will
> clear it or modify it between the two xsaves_nmi().
What prevents it from being freed, reallocated to some other user, freed
and reallocated to the per-cpu buffer? ;)
But, really, the thing that saves you here is that the modified
optimization only comes into effect if you XRSTOR from an XSAVE buffer.
This buffer is only ever XSAVES'd to.
So I think it's safe ... from the modified optimization. I'll look at
the init optimization later in the series.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 13:49 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-06-13 14:39 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 14:54 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:19 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:15 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:51 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 18:14 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] perf: Support extension of sample_regs kan.liang
2025-06-17 8:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 9:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 12:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:55 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 19:00 ` Mark Brown
2025-06-17 20:32 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 10:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 14:47 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 15:22 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] perf/x86: Add YMMH in extended regs kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] perf/x86: Add APX " kan.liang
2025-06-13 16:02 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:17 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] perf/x86: Add OPMASK " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] perf/x86: Add SSP " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Support extended registers kan.liang
2025-06-17 7:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 15:23 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 0:57 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 10:47 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 12:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 13:15 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 0:41 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 11:11 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 12:26 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 14:27 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5d21a4c-bfb1-4a0f-8302-d3b78fcc8f3e@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).