From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Darshit Shah <darnshah@amazon.de>, lukas@wunner.de
Cc: Jonthan.Cameron@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, darnir@gnu.org,
feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
nh-open-source@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers/pci: Decouple DPC from AER service
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 07:29:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c603bed2-7d1f-4559-a7d6-dcbd91a03f3b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251208112545.21315-2-darnshah@amazon.de>
Hi,
On 12/8/25 3:25 AM, Darshit Shah wrote:
> According to [1] it is recommended that the Operating System link the
> enablement of Downstream Port Containment (DPC) to the enablement of
> Advanced Error Reporting (AER).
>
> However, AER is advertised only on Root Port (RP) or Root Complex Event
> Collector (RCEC) devices. On the other hand, DPC may be advertised on
> any PCIe device in the hierarchy. In fact, since the main usecase of DPC
> is for the switch upstream of an endpoint device to trigger a signal to
> the host-bridge, it is imperative that it be supported on non-RP,
> non-RCEC devices.
>
> Previously portdrv has interpreted [1] to mean that the AER service must
> be available on the same device in order for DPC to be available. This is
> not what the implementation note in [1] meant to imply. If the firmware
> hands the OS control of AER via _OSC on the host bridge upstream of the
> device, then the OS should be allowed to assume control of DPC on that device.
>
> The comment above this check alludes to this, by saying:
> > With dpc-native, allow Linux to use DPC even if it doesn't have permission
> > to use AER.
> However, permission to use AER is negotiated at the host bridge, not
> per-device. So we should not link DPC to enabling AER at the device.
> Instead, DPC should be enabled if the OS has control of AER for the
> host bridge that is upstream of the device in question, or if dpc-native
> was set on the command line.
>
> [1]: PCI Express Base Specification Revision 5.0 Version 1.0, Sec. 6.2.10
>
> Signed-off-by: Darshit Shah <darnshah@amazon.de>
> ---
Looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Changes in patch v2:
> * Don't touch the PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER attachment
> * Stop relying on PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER for enabling DPC
> * Instead test that OS has control of AER at parent host bridge
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> index 38a41ccf79b9..8db2fa140ae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> if (pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DPC) &&
> pci_aer_available() &&
> - (pcie_ports_dpc_native || (services & PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER)))
> + (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_dpc_native))
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC;
>
> /* Enable bandwidth control if more than one speed is supported. */
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-28 12:20 [PATCH] drivers/pci: Allow attaching AER to non-RP devices that support MSI Darshit Shah
2025-11-28 17:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-12-08 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Darshit Shah
2025-12-08 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers/pci: Decouple DPC from AER service Darshit Shah
2025-12-09 7:45 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-12-11 16:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Darshit Shah
2026-02-28 23:59 ` Darshit Shah
2025-12-09 15:29 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
2025-12-09 0:30 ` [PATCH] drivers/pci: Allow attaching AER to non-RP devices that support MSI Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c603bed2-7d1f-4559-a7d6-dcbd91a03f3b@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jonthan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=darnir@gnu.org \
--cc=darnshah@amazon.de \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox