public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Avoid direct referencing page table enties in map_range()
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:48:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c65c0bcc-149e-4f30-9bab-e5377230d2cd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801113440.GB4476@willie-the-truck>

On 01/08/2024 12:34, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 25/07/2024 10:10, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> Like else where in arm64 platform, use WRITE_ONCE() in map_range() while
>>> creating page table entries. This avoids referencing page table entries
>>> directly.
>>
>> I could be wrong, but I don't think this code is ever operating on live
>> pgtables? So there is never a potential to race with the HW walker and therefore
>> no need to guarrantee copy atomicity? As long as the correct barriers are placed
>> at the point where you load the pgdir into the TTBRx there should be no problem?
>>
>> If my assertion is correct, I don't think there is any need for this change.
> 
> Agreed.

I think I need to row back on this. It looks like map_range() does act on live
pgtables; see map_kernel() where twopass == true. init_pg_dir is populated then
installed in TTBR1, then permissions are modified with 3 [un]map_segment()
calls, which call through to map_range().

So on that basis, I think the WRITE_ONCE() calls are warranted. And to be
consistent, I'd additionally recommend adding a READ_ONCE() around the:

if (pte_none(*tbl)) {

Thanks,
Ryan

> 
> Will


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-01 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25  9:10 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Avoid direct referencing page table enties in map_range() Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 10:36 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-26 11:26   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-08-01 11:34   ` Will Deacon
2024-08-01 12:48     ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-08-01 13:23       ` Will Deacon
2024-08-01 14:07         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-08-01 14:46           ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c65c0bcc-149e-4f30-9bab-e5377230d2cd@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox