From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264884AbUDWRaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:30:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264886AbUDWRaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:30:22 -0400 Received: from news.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:24794 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264884AbUDWRaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:30:22 -0400 From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" Subject: Re: File system compression, not at the block layer Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Group Message-ID: References: <408951CE.3080908@techsource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1082741421 26332 62.216.29.200 (23 Apr 2004 17:30:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <408951CE.3080908@techsource.com>, Timothy Miller wrote: >Well, why not do the compression at the highest layer? >[...] doing it transparently and for all files. http://e2compr.sourceforge.net/ Mike.